From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
To: Omar Ramirez Luna <omar.ramirez@ti.com>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
Hiroshi DOYU <Hiroshi.DOYU@nokia.com>,
Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>,
Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@nokia.com>,
Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>, Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>,
Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com>,
"Govindraj.R" <govindraj.raja@ti.com>,
C A Subramaniam <subramaniam.ca@ti.com>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] omap: mailbox: add omap_device latency information
Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2010 15:48:10 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87hbfqf491.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1288129984-22957-4-git-send-email-omar.ramirez@ti.com> (Omar Ramirez Luna's message of "Tue, 26 Oct 2010 16:53:02 -0500")
Omar Ramirez Luna <omar.ramirez@ti.com> writes:
> From: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
>
> So that we can enable the main clock.
-ENO_DESCRIPTIVE_CHANGELOG
omap_device_enable/disable do more than just manage the clocks
> Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Omar Ramirez Luna <omar.ramirez@ti.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++--
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/mailbox.c | 21 +++++++++------------
> arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/mailbox.h | 6 ++++++
> 3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c
> index d977572..337fd7a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c
> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
> #include <plat/dma.h>
> #include <plat/omap_hwmod.h>
> #include <plat/omap_device.h>
> +#include <plat/mailbox.h>
>
> #include "mux.h"
> #include "control.h"
> @@ -141,10 +142,20 @@ static inline void omap_init_camera(void)
> #endif
>
> #if defined(CONFIG_OMAP_MBOX_FWK) || defined(CONFIG_OMAP_MBOX_FWK_MODULE)
> +static struct omap_device_pm_latency mbox_latencies[] = {
> + [0] = {
> + .activate_func = omap_device_enable_clocks,
> + .activate_lat = 50000, /* FIXME random value */
> + .deactivate_func = omap_device_enable_clocks,
> + .deactivate_lat = 50000, /* FIXME random value */
> + },
> +};
hmm, I'm hoping you're not expecting this to merge when using random values.
> static inline void omap_init_mbox(void)
> {
> struct omap_hwmod *oh;
> struct omap_device *od;
> + struct omap_mbox_platform_data pdata;
>
> oh = omap_hwmod_lookup("mailbox");
> if (!oh) {
> @@ -152,10 +163,14 @@ static inline void omap_init_mbox(void)
> return;
> }
>
> + pdata.device_enable = omap_device_enable;
> + pdata.device_disable = omap_device_idle;
If the driver want's to use the hooks, just use the runtime PM API.
More on this below.
> od = omap_device_build("omap-mailbox", -1, oh,
> - NULL, 0,
> - NULL, 0,
> + &pdata, sizeof(pdata),
> + mbox_latencies, ARRAY_SIZE(mbox_latencies),
> 0);
> +
> if (!od) {
> pr_err("%s: could not build device\n", __func__);
> return;
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/mailbox.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/mailbox.c
> index 1ddb82d..61f2149 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/mailbox.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/mailbox.c
> @@ -53,6 +53,7 @@
> #define OMAP4_MBOX_NR_REGS (OMAP4_MBOX_REG_SIZE / sizeof(u32))
>
> static void __iomem *mbox_base;
> +static struct platform_device *mbox_pdev;
>
> struct omap_mbox2_fifo {
> unsigned long msg;
> @@ -71,8 +72,6 @@ struct omap_mbox2_priv {
> unsigned long irqdisable;
> };
>
> -static struct clk *mbox_ick_handle;
> -
> static void omap2_mbox_enable_irq(struct omap_mbox *mbox,
> omap_mbox_type_t irq);
>
> @@ -91,14 +90,10 @@ static int omap2_mbox_startup(struct omap_mbox *mbox)
> {
> u32 l;
> unsigned long timeout;
> + struct omap_mbox_platform_data *pdata = mbox_pdev->dev.platform_data;
>
> - mbox_ick_handle = clk_get(NULL, "mailboxes_ick");
> - if (IS_ERR(mbox_ick_handle)) {
> - printk(KERN_ERR "Could not get mailboxes_ick: %ld\n",
> - PTR_ERR(mbox_ick_handle));
> - return PTR_ERR(mbox_ick_handle);
> - }
> - clk_enable(mbox_ick_handle);
> + if (pdata->device_enable)
> + pdata->device_enable(mbox_pdev);
pm_runtime_get_sync(dev)
> if (cpu_is_omap44xx()) {
> mbox_write_reg(OMAP4_SOFTRESET, MAILBOX_SYSCONFIG);
> @@ -144,9 +139,9 @@ static int omap2_mbox_startup(struct omap_mbox *mbox)
>
> static void omap2_mbox_shutdown(struct omap_mbox *mbox)
> {
> - clk_disable(mbox_ick_handle);
> - clk_put(mbox_ick_handle);
> - mbox_ick_handle = NULL;
> + struct omap_mbox_platform_data *pdata = mbox_pdev->dev.platform_data;
> + if (pdata->device_disable)
> + pdata->device_disable(mbox_pdev);
pm_runtime_put(dev)
> }
>
> /* Mailbox FIFO handle functions */
> @@ -428,6 +423,8 @@ static int __devinit omap2_mbox_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (!mbox_base)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> + mbox_pdev = pdev;
please don't use a global for this. What if a future SoC has more than
one mailbox?
How about adding a field to struct omap_mbox?
> ret = omap_mbox_register(&pdev->dev, list);
> if (ret) {
> iounmap(mbox_base);
> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/mailbox.h b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/mailbox.h
> index 9976565..59443b1 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/mailbox.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/mailbox.h
> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
>
> typedef u32 mbox_msg_t;
> struct omap_mbox;
> +struct platform_device;
>
> typedef int __bitwise omap_mbox_irq_t;
> #define IRQ_TX ((__force omap_mbox_irq_t) 1)
> @@ -59,6 +60,11 @@ struct omap_mbox {
> void *priv;
> };
>
> +struct omap_mbox_platform_data {
> + int (*device_enable)(struct platform_device *pdev);
> + int (*device_disable)(struct platform_device *pdev);
> +};
> +
> int omap_mbox_msg_send(struct omap_mbox *, mbox_msg_t msg);
> void omap_mbox_init_seq(struct omap_mbox *);
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-09 23:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-26 21:52 [PATCH 0/5] omap: mailbox: hwmod support and dependent cleanup patches Omar Ramirez Luna
2010-10-26 21:53 ` [PATCH 1/5] omap: mailbox: initial hwmod support for omap3 Omar Ramirez Luna
2010-10-27 5:07 ` Varadarajan, Charulatha
2010-10-27 11:50 ` Omar Ramirez Luna
2010-11-09 23:38 ` Kevin Hilman
2010-11-10 3:08 ` Ramirez Luna, Omar
2010-10-26 21:53 ` [PATCH 2/5] omap: mailbox: initial hwmod support for omap2 Omar Ramirez Luna
2010-10-27 5:07 ` Varadarajan, Charulatha
2010-10-26 21:53 ` [PATCH 3/5] omap: mailbox: add omap_device latency information Omar Ramirez Luna
2010-11-09 23:48 ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2010-11-10 1:18 ` Felipe Contreras
2010-11-10 3:03 ` Ramirez Luna, Omar
2010-10-26 21:53 ` [PATCH 4/5] omap: mailbox: fix detection for previously supported chips Omar Ramirez Luna
2010-10-27 5:06 ` Varadarajan, Charulatha
2010-10-27 7:28 ` Felipe Contreras
2010-10-27 9:00 ` Grazvydas Ignotas
2010-10-27 9:46 ` Felipe Contreras
2010-10-26 21:53 ` [PATCH 5/5] omap: mailbox: remove unreachable return Omar Ramirez Luna
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87hbfqf491.fsf@deeprootsystems.com \
--to=khilman@deeprootsystems.com \
--cc=Hiroshi.DOYU@nokia.com \
--cc=b-cousson@ti.com \
--cc=dmitry.kasatkin@nokia.com \
--cc=felipe.contreras@gmail.com \
--cc=govindraj.raja@ti.com \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=omar.ramirez@ti.com \
--cc=paul@pwsan.com \
--cc=s-anna@ti.com \
--cc=subramaniam.ca@ti.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox