public inbox for linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
To: Charulatha V <charu@ti.com>
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, rnayak@ti.com, paul@pwsan.com,
	tony@atomide.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8 RFC] OMAP: GPIO: Split OMAP1 and OMAP2PLUS
Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2010 15:31:19 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87hbnojjrc.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1270038239-1090-1-git-send-email-charu@ti.com> (Charulatha V.'s message of "Wed\, 31 Mar 2010 17\:53\:51 +0530")

Charulatha V <charu@ti.com> writes:

> This patch series is in preparation to adapt GPIO to HWMOD FW.
> It creates OMAP architecture specific gpio files to handle
> SoC specific gpio_init. The common plat-omap/gpio.c handles all
> common GPIO APIs.
>
> OMAP2PLUS GPIO module is implemented as early platform device and
> OMAP1 GPIO is still handled in old way via gpio_init from board files.
>
> Save/restore context, gpio_prepare_for_retention and
> gpio_resume_after_retention APIs are also handled in plat-omap layer.
> These APIs are currently not used in OMAP1, but still they might
> become common for different OMAP architectures in the future.
> Hence they are handled in plat-omap layer. If they need to be moved
> to mach-omap2 layer, additional patches may be sent during
> next version of this patch series.
>
> This patch series is generated on top of linux-omap-2.6 branch: master
> and tested on 3430SDP, 4430SDP & zoom3.

I have many problems with this series, but without going into the
specifics of each patch, I have a big problem with the general
approach being taken here.

You say this is in preparation for adaptation to hwmod, but in fact,
this series is duplicating a lot of the work you would get for free by
starting with hwmod.

You're generating a bunch of code that will be completely thrown away
with a hwmod conversion.  Instead, you should *start* by using hwmod +
omap_device to generate the platform_devices for you.  Doing this, you
will drop patches 2, 3 and 4 entirely (they are mostly identical
anyways, except for the search-and-replace) and also eliminate the
need for patch 5.

What is needed here is a way to introduce the platform_device
conversion without introducing signifcant functional changes at the
same time.  Here's a proposal to do that, and which should also be
considerably easier to review for sanity:

- use hwmod + omap_device to generate (early) platform_devices
- modify plat-omap/gpio.c to use base addr and IRQ from platform_device
- modify plat-omap/gpio.c to get clocks based on 'struct device'

For an example, you can see the pm-wip/hwmods branch in my tree for
how this was done for UART and the pm-wip/mmc branch for how this was
done for MMC.

Kevin

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-04-06 22:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-03-31 12:23 [PATCH 0/8 RFC] OMAP: GPIO: Split OMAP1 and OMAP2PLUS Charulatha V
2010-03-31 12:23 ` [PATCH 1/8] OMAP:GPIO:Move architecture specific macros to specific header Charulatha V
2010-03-31 12:23   ` [PATCH 2/8] OMAP3:GPIO:Add support for early platform gpio device Charulatha V
2010-03-31 12:23     ` [PATCH 3/8] OMAP2:GPIO:Add " Charulatha V
2010-03-31 12:23       ` [PATCH 4/8] OMAP4:GPIO:Add " Charulatha V
2010-03-31 12:23         ` [PATCH 5/8] OMAP2PLUS:GPIO:Add OMAP2PLUS specific gpio support Charulatha V
2010-03-31 12:23           ` [PATCH 6/8] OMAP1:GPIO:Support for OMAP1 specific gpio Charulatha V
2010-03-31 12:23             ` [PATCH 7/8] OMAP2PLUS:GPIO:Move gpio_init from board files to init_common_hw Charulatha V
2010-03-31 12:23               ` [PATCH 8/8] OMAP:GPIO:Common platform code for all OMAPs Charulatha V
2010-04-01  9:34                 ` Tony Lindgren
2010-04-01  9:32               ` [PATCH 7/8] OMAP2PLUS:GPIO:Move gpio_init from board files to init_common_hw Tony Lindgren
2010-04-01 10:50                 ` Varadarajan, Charulatha
2010-04-06 22:13               ` Kevin Hilman
2010-04-01  9:30           ` [PATCH 5/8] OMAP2PLUS:GPIO:Add OMAP2PLUS specific gpio support Tony Lindgren
2010-04-06 22:08             ` Kevin Hilman
2010-04-01  7:26       ` [PATCH 3/8] OMAP2:GPIO:Add support for early platform gpio device Felipe Balbi
2010-04-01  8:53         ` Varadarajan, Charulatha
2010-04-01  8:58           ` Felipe Balbi
2010-04-01  9:16             ` Varadarajan, Charulatha
2010-04-01  7:23     ` [PATCH 2/8] OMAP3:GPIO:Add " Felipe Balbi
2010-04-01  8:58       ` Varadarajan, Charulatha
2010-04-01  9:12         ` Tony Lindgren
2010-04-01  9:19           ` Varadarajan, Charulatha
2010-04-01  9:13     ` Tony Lindgren
2010-04-01 10:49       ` Varadarajan, Charulatha
2010-04-01  9:31     ` Tony Lindgren
2010-04-01 10:50       ` Varadarajan, Charulatha
2010-04-01  7:17   ` [PATCH 1/8] OMAP:GPIO:Move architecture specific macros to specific header Felipe Balbi
2010-04-01  8:52     ` Varadarajan, Charulatha
2010-04-01  9:00       ` Felipe Balbi
2010-04-01  9:41       ` Tony Lindgren
2010-04-01 10:50         ` Varadarajan, Charulatha
2010-04-06 22:31 ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2010-04-12 12:16   ` [PATCH 0/8 RFC] OMAP: GPIO: Split OMAP1 and OMAP2PLUS Varadarajan, Charulatha
2010-04-19 14:31     ` Kevin Hilman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87hbnojjrc.fsf@deeprootsystems.com \
    --to=khilman@deeprootsystems.com \
    --cc=charu@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@pwsan.com \
    --cc=rnayak@ti.com \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox