public inbox for linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
To: Vaibhav Hiremath <hvaibhav@ti.com>
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>, Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: am33xx: Make am33xx as a separate class
Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 14:57:14 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ipg6l4jp.fsf@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1336490630-7272-1-git-send-email-hvaibhav@ti.com> (Vaibhav Hiremath's message of "Tue, 8 May 2012 20:53:50 +0530")

Vaibhav Hiremath <hvaibhav@ti.com> writes:

> Initially, we decided to make am33xx family of device to fall
> under omap3 class (cpu_is_omap34xx() = true), since it carries
> Cortex-A8 core. But while adding complete baseport support
> (like, clock, power and hwmod) support, it is observed that,
> we are creating more and more problems by treating am33xx device
> as omap3 family, as nothing matches between them
> (except cortex-A8 mpu).
>
> So,  after long discussion we have came to the conclusion that,
> we should not consider am33xx device as omap3 family, instead
> create separate class (SOC_OMAPAM33XX) under OMAP2PLUS.
> This means, for am33xx device, cpu_is_omap34xx() will return false,
> and only cpu_is_am33xx() will be true.

Not directly related to this patch, but does anyone have any objection
to dropping the OMAP from the SOC_ names for AM33xx and TI81XX?

I'll post a series shortly to do so.

Kevin


  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-05-08 21:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-08 15:23 [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: am33xx: Make am33xx as a separate class Vaibhav Hiremath
2012-05-08 20:08 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-05-09  9:08   ` Hiremath, Vaibhav
2012-05-08 21:57 ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2012-05-08 21:58   ` Tony Lindgren

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87ipg6l4jp.fsf@ti.com \
    --to=khilman@ti.com \
    --cc=hvaibhav@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@pwsan.com \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox