From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
To: Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com>
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
paul@pwsan.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] OMAP2+: pm: Use hwmod name instead of dev pointer
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 15:24:57 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ippd8bie.fsf@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1314026347-21623-5-git-send-email-b-cousson@ti.com> (Benoit Cousson's message of "Mon, 22 Aug 2011 17:19:04 +0200")
Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com> writes:
> Replace the struct device parameter of omap2_set_init_voltage
> by the hwmod name. It will avoid having to store explicitely
> the device pointer into a static variable.
> Moreover, it will be a little bit more scalable if we introduce
> new DVFS devices.
>
> Signed-off-by: Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com>
> Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.c | 22 +++++++++++++++-------
> 1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.c
> index 54281e5..17725d2 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.c
> @@ -171,18 +171,26 @@ err:
> * in the opp entry
> */
> static int __init omap2_set_init_voltage(char *vdd_name, char *clk_name,
> - struct device *dev)
> + const char *oh_name)
> {
> struct voltagedomain *voltdm;
> struct clk *clk;
> struct opp *opp;
> unsigned long freq, bootup_volt;
> + struct device *dev;
>
> - if (!vdd_name || !clk_name || !dev) {
> + if (!vdd_name || !clk_name || !oh_name) {
> printk(KERN_ERR "%s: Invalid parameters!\n", __func__);
> goto exit;
> }
>
> + dev = omap_hwmod_name_get_dev(oh_name);
> + if (IS_ERR(dev)) {
> + pr_err("%s: Unable to get dev pointer for hwmod %s\n",
> + __func__, oh_name);
> + goto exit;
> + }
> +
> voltdm = omap_voltage_domain_lookup(vdd_name);
> if (IS_ERR(voltdm)) {
> printk(KERN_ERR "%s: Unable to get vdd pointer for vdd_%s\n",
> @@ -228,8 +236,8 @@ static void __init omap3_init_voltages(void)
> if (!cpu_is_omap34xx())
> return;
>
> - omap2_set_init_voltage("mpu", "dpll1_ck", mpu_dev);
> - omap2_set_init_voltage("core", "l3_ick", l3_dev);
> + omap2_set_init_voltage("mpu", "dpll1_ck", "mpu");
> + omap2_set_init_voltage("core", "l3_ick", "l3_main");
> }
>
> static void __init omap4_init_voltages(void)
> @@ -237,9 +245,9 @@ static void __init omap4_init_voltages(void)
> if (!cpu_is_omap44xx())
> return;
>
> - omap2_set_init_voltage("mpu", "dpll_mpu_ck", mpu_dev);
> - omap2_set_init_voltage("core", "l3_div_ck", l3_dev);
> - omap2_set_init_voltage("iva", "dpll_iva_m5x2_ck", iva_dev);
> + omap2_set_init_voltage("mpu", "dpll_mpu_ck", "mpu");
> + omap2_set_init_voltage("core", "l3_div_ck", "l3_main_1");
> + omap2_set_init_voltage("iva", "dpll_iva_m5x2_ck", "iva");
> }
>
> static int __init omap2_common_pm_init(void)
Looks fine.
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-31 22:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-22 15:19 [PATCH 0/7] OMAP: omap_device cleanup before device-tree integration Benoit Cousson
2011-08-22 15:19 ` [PATCH 1/7] OMAP: PM: omap_device: add omap_hwmod_name_get_odev Benoit Cousson
2011-08-31 22:20 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-09-01 11:48 ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-09-01 20:44 ` Menon, Nishanth
2011-09-26 18:18 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-08-22 15:19 ` [PATCH 2/7] OMAP: PM: omap_device: add few quick access functions Benoit Cousson
2011-08-31 22:23 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-09-01 11:55 ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-09-01 14:55 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-09-02 12:39 ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-08-22 15:19 ` [PATCH 3/7] OMAP3: beagle-board: Use the omap_hwmod_name_get_dev API Benoit Cousson
2011-08-31 22:24 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-08-22 15:19 ` [PATCH 4/7] OMAP2+: pm: Use hwmod name instead of dev pointer Benoit Cousson
2011-08-31 22:24 ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2011-08-22 15:19 ` [PATCH 5/7] OMAP2+: pm: Remove static devices variable for mpu, dsp, iva and l3 PM Benoit Cousson
2011-08-31 22:25 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-08-22 15:19 ` [PATCH 6/7] OMAP: omap_device: Create a default omap_device_pm_latency Benoit Cousson
2011-08-31 22:30 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-08-22 15:19 ` [PATCH 7/7] OMAP2+: devices: Remove all omap_device_pm_latency structures Benoit Cousson
2011-08-31 22:31 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-09-01 11:59 ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-09-01 16:28 ` [PATCH 0/7] OMAP: omap_device cleanup before device-tree integration Kevin Hilman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ippd8bie.fsf@ti.com \
--to=khilman@ti.com \
--cc=b-cousson@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@pwsan.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).