From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] OMAP4: I2C : I2C context save
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 14:15:19 -0700
Message-ID: <87k4blopaw.fsf@ti.com>
References: <1309857646-29401-1-git-send-email-shubhrajyoti@ti.com>
	<20110713190723.GA3369@freya.fluff.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from na3sys009aog119.obsmtp.com ([74.125.149.246]:56321 "EHLO
	na3sys009aog119.obsmtp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751586Ab1GMVPY (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 13 Jul 2011 17:15:24 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20110713190723.GA3369@freya.fluff.org> (Ben Dooks's message of
	"Wed, 13 Jul 2011 20:07:23 +0100")
Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
To: Ben Dooks <ben-i2c@fluff.org>
Cc: Shubhrajyoti D <shubhrajyoti@ti.com>, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org

Ben Dooks <ben-i2c@fluff.org> writes:

> On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 02:50:46PM +0530, Shubhrajyoti D wrote:
>> Currently the OMAP4 doesnot hit device off still the
>> driver may have support for it.Adding support for the
>> same.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Shubhrajyoti D <shubhrajyoti@ti.com>
>
> I guess since the previous set has been taken by Kevin
> then these will be too.

Sure, I'll pick these up, but it's probably to late for v3.1.

We've already submitted the bulk of the OMAP stuff for v3.1.

Kevin