From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
To: Tero Kristo <tero.kristo@nokia.com>
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] OMAP3: CPUidle: Added peripheral pwrdm checks into bm check
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 11:58:50 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87k4xqi6md.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1258045359-7962-7-git-send-email-tero.kristo@nokia.com> (Tero Kristo's message of "Thu\, 12 Nov 2009 19\:02\:39 +0200")
Tero Kristo <tero.kristo@nokia.com> writes:
> From: Tero Kristo <tero.kristo@nokia.com>
>
> Following checks are made (and their reasoning):
>
> - If CAM domain is active, prevent idle completely
> * CAM pwrdm does not have HW wakeup capability
> - If PER is likely to remain on, prevent PER off
> * Saves on unnecessary context save/restore
> - If CORE domain is active, prevent PER off-mode
> * PER off in this case would prevent wakeups from PER completely
> - Only allow CORE off, if all peripheral domains are off
> * CORE off will cause a chipwide reset
>
> Also, enabled CHECK_BM flag for C2, as this is needed for the camera case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo <tero.kristo@nokia.com>
Some questions and a couple minor style comments below...
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.c | 105 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 files changed, 98 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.c
> index e46345f..4654e87 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.c
> @@ -58,7 +58,8 @@ struct omap3_processor_cx {
>
> struct omap3_processor_cx omap3_power_states[OMAP3_MAX_STATES];
> struct omap3_processor_cx current_cx_state;
> -struct powerdomain *mpu_pd, *core_pd;
> +struct powerdomain *mpu_pd, *core_pd, *per_pd, *iva2_pd;
> +struct powerdomain *sgx_pd, *usb_pd, *cam_pd, *dss_pd;
>
> /*
> * The latencies/thresholds for various C states have
> @@ -91,6 +92,13 @@ static int omap3_idle_bm_check(void)
> return 0;
> }
> +static int pwrdm_get_idle_state(struct powerdomain *pwrdm)
could use a function comment
> +{
> + if (pwrdm_can_idle(pwrdm))
> + return pwrdm_read_next_pwrst(pwrdm);
> + return PWRDM_POWER_ON;
> +}
> +
Possible candidate for powerdomain API?
> /**
> * omap3_enter_idle - Programs OMAP3 to enter the specified state
> * @dev: cpuidle device
> @@ -153,14 +161,90 @@ static int omap3_enter_idle_bm(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
> struct cpuidle_state *state)
> {
> struct cpuidle_state *new_state = state;
> -
> - if ((state->flags & CPUIDLE_FLAG_CHECK_BM) && omap3_idle_bm_check()) {
> - BUG_ON(!dev->safe_state);
> - new_state = dev->safe_state;
> + u32 per_state = 0, saved_per_state = 0, cam_state, usb_state;
> + u32 iva2_state, sgx_state, dss_state, new_core_state;
> + struct omap3_processor_cx *cx;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (state->flags & CPUIDLE_FLAG_CHECK_BM) {
> + if (omap3_idle_bm_check()) {
> + BUG_ON(!dev->safe_state);
> + new_state = dev->safe_state;
> + goto select_state;
> + }
> + cx = cpuidle_get_statedata(state);
> + new_core_state = cx->core_state;
> +
> + /* Check if CORE is active, if yes, fallback to inactive */
> + if (!pwrdm_can_idle(core_pd))
> + new_core_state = PWRDM_POWER_INACTIVE;
> +
> + /*
> + * Prevent idle completely if CAM is active.
> + * CAM does not have wakeup capability in OMAP3.
> + */
> + cam_state = pwrdm_get_idle_state(cam_pd);
> + if (cam_state == PWRDM_POWER_ON) {
> + new_state = dev->safe_state;
> + goto select_state;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * Check if PER can idle or not. If we are not likely
> + * to idle, deny PER off. This prevents unnecessary
> + * context save/restore.
> + */
> + saved_per_state = pwrdm_read_next_pwrst(per_pd);
> + if (pwrdm_can_idle(per_pd)) {
> + per_state = saved_per_state;
> + /*
> + * Prevent PER off if CORE is active as this
> + * would disable PER wakeups completely
> + */
> + if (per_state == PWRDM_POWER_OFF &&
> + new_core_state > PWRDM_POWER_RET)
> + per_state = PWRDM_POWER_RET;
> +
> + } else if (saved_per_state == PWRDM_POWER_OFF)
> + per_state = PWRDM_POWER_RET;
> +
> + /*
> + * If we are attempting CORE off, check if any other
> + * powerdomains are at retention or higher. CORE off causes
> + * chipwide reset which would reset these domains also.
> + */
> + if (new_core_state == PWRDM_POWER_OFF) {
> + dss_state = pwrdm_get_idle_state(dss_pd);
> + iva2_state = pwrdm_get_idle_state(iva2_pd);
> + sgx_state = pwrdm_get_idle_state(sgx_pd);
> + usb_state = pwrdm_get_idle_state(usb_pd);
> +
> + if (cam_state > PWRDM_POWER_OFF ||
> + dss_state > PWRDM_POWER_OFF ||
> + iva2_state > PWRDM_POWER_OFF ||
> + per_state > PWRDM_POWER_OFF ||
> + sgx_state > PWRDM_POWER_OFF ||
> + usb_state > PWRDM_POWER_OFF)
> + new_core_state = PWRDM_POWER_RET;
> + }
add a blank line here
> + /* Fallback to new target core state */
> + while (cx->core_state > new_core_state) {
> + state--;
> + cx = cpuidle_get_statedata(state);
> + }
> + new_state = state;
here
> + /* Are we changing PER target state? */
> + if (per_state != saved_per_state)
> + pwrdm_set_next_pwrst(per_pd, per_state);
> }
>
> +select_state:
> dev->last_state = new_state;
> - return omap3_enter_idle(dev, new_state);
> + ret = omap3_enter_idle(dev, new_state);
here
> + /* Restore potentially tampered PER state */
> + if (per_state != saved_per_state)
> + pwrdm_set_next_pwrst(per_pd, saved_per_state);
and here
+ return ret;
> }
>
> DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpuidle_device, omap3_idle_dev);
> @@ -220,7 +304,8 @@ void omap_init_power_states(void)
> cpuidle_params_table[OMAP3_STATE_C2].threshold;
> omap3_power_states[OMAP3_STATE_C2].mpu_state = PWRDM_POWER_INACTIVE;
> omap3_power_states[OMAP3_STATE_C2].core_state = PWRDM_POWER_INACTIVE;
> - omap3_power_states[OMAP3_STATE_C2].flags = CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIME_VALID;
> + omap3_power_states[OMAP3_STATE_C2].flags = CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIME_VALID |
> + CPUIDLE_FLAG_CHECK_BM;
>
> /* C3 . MPU CSWR + Core inactive */
> omap3_power_states[OMAP3_STATE_C3].valid = 1;
> @@ -313,6 +398,12 @@ int __init omap3_idle_init(void)
>
> mpu_pd = pwrdm_lookup("mpu_pwrdm");
> core_pd = pwrdm_lookup("core_pwrdm");
> + per_pd = pwrdm_lookup("per_pwrdm");
> + iva2_pd = pwrdm_lookup("iva2_pwrdm");
> + sgx_pd = pwrdm_lookup("sgx_pwrdm");
> + usb_pd = pwrdm_lookup("usbhost_pwrdm");
> + cam_pd = pwrdm_lookup("cam_pwrdm");
> + dss_pd = pwrdm_lookup("dss_pwrdm");
>
> omap_init_power_states();
> cpuidle_register_driver(&omap3_idle_driver);
> --
> 1.5.4.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-16 19:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-12 17:02 [PATCH 0/6] Idle status patches revisited Tero Kristo
2009-11-12 17:02 ` [PATCH 1/6] OMAP: Powerdomains: Add support for INACTIVE state on pwrdm level Tero Kristo
2009-11-12 17:02 ` [PATCH 2/6] OMAP3: PM: Added support for INACTIVE and ON states for powerdomains Tero Kristo
2009-11-12 17:02 ` [PATCH 3/6] OMAP3: CPUidle: Fixed support for ON / INACTIVE states Tero Kristo
2009-11-12 17:02 ` [PATCH 4/6] OMAP3: PM: Removed PER + CORE state hacking from omap_sram_idle Tero Kristo
2009-11-12 17:02 ` [PATCH 5/6] OMAP: Powerdomains: Add support for checking if pwrdm can idle Tero Kristo
2009-11-12 17:02 ` [PATCH 6/6] OMAP3: CPUidle: Added peripheral pwrdm checks into bm check Tero Kristo
2009-11-16 19:58 ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2009-11-17 11:12 ` Tero.Kristo
2009-11-16 20:13 ` [PATCH 5/6] OMAP: Powerdomains: Add support for checking if pwrdm can idle Kevin Hilman
2009-11-17 11:33 ` Tero.Kristo
2009-11-16 19:45 ` [PATCH 4/6] OMAP3: PM: Removed PER + CORE state hacking from omap_sram_idle Kevin Hilman
2009-11-17 11:08 ` Tero.Kristo
2009-11-16 19:42 ` [PATCH 2/6] OMAP3: PM: Added support for INACTIVE and ON states for powerdomains Kevin Hilman
2009-11-17 11:07 ` Tero.Kristo
2009-11-16 19:30 ` [PATCH 0/6] Idle status patches revisited Kevin Hilman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87k4xqi6md.fsf@deeprootsystems.com \
--to=khilman@deeprootsystems.com \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tero.kristo@nokia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox