From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kevin Hilman Subject: Re: Which directory should OMAP-L137/L138's code in ? Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 07:23:41 -0700 Message-ID: <87ljnxledu.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> References: <4A32264F.6050609@windriver.com> <20090612103200.GB7060@atomide.com> <0680EC522D0CC943BC586913CF3768C00378B66E47@dbde02.ent.ti.com> <4A324588.3010406@windriver.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-pz0-f187.google.com ([209.85.222.187]:60793 "EHLO mail-pz0-f187.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1764695AbZFLOXm (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Jun 2009 10:23:42 -0400 Received: by pzk17 with SMTP id 17so619721pzk.33 for ; Fri, 12 Jun 2009 07:23:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4A324588.3010406@windriver.com> (stanley miao's message of "Fri\, 12 Jun 2009 20\:09\:44 +0800") Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: "stanley.miao" Cc: "Syed Mohammed, Khasim" , Tony Lindgren , "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" And yesterday, I commited the core arch support for the da830/omap-L137 SoC to DaVinci git. http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/khilman/linux-davinci.git This part is OMAP in name and marketing spin only. This is very much in the davinci family of SoCs, so I expect more confusion on this in the future. Kevin "stanley.miao" writes: > Thanks a lot. > > Stanley. > > Syed Mohammed, Khasim wrote: >> Hi, >> >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Tony >>> Lindgren >>> Sent: Friday, June 12, 2009 4:02 PM >>> To: stanley.miao; Kevin Hilman >>> Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org >>> Subject: Re: Which directory should OMAP-L137/L138's code in ? >>> >>> * stanley.miao [090612 02:53]: >>> >>>> I am developing on the board OMAP-L137/L138, which is similar with >>>> Davinci series board. Should I put its platform file in the directory >>>> arch/arm/mach-davinci ? or create a new direcory arch/arch/mach-L1xx for >>>> it ? >>>> >>>> Any suggestions ? >>>> >>> If it uses DaVinci core code to me it sounds like it should be under >>> mach-davinci. Kevin? >>> >>> >> >> The TI code for OMAP L 13x is part of mach-davinci. And the platform specific patches to be submitted to Davinci mailing list for upstream submissions. >> >> Regards, >> Khasim >> >>