* [PATCHv2 1/1] omap3: cpuidle: Update statistics for correct state
@ 2009-11-24 17:50 Sanjeev Premi
2010-01-25 19:54 ` Kevin Hilman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Sanjeev Premi @ 2009-11-24 17:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-omap; +Cc: Sanjeev Premi
When 'enable_off_mode' is 0, the target power state for MPU
and CORE was locally changed to PWRDM_POWER_RET but, the
statistics are updated for idle state originally selected
by the governor.
This patch 'invalidates' the idle states that lead either of
MPU or Core to PWRDM_POWER_OFF state when 'enable_off_mode'
is '0'. The states are valid once 'enable_off_mode' is set
to '1'.
Added function next_valid_state() to check if current state
is valid; else get the next valid state. It is called from
omap3_enter_idle_bm().
Signed-off-by: Sanjeev Premi <premi@ti.com>
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.c | 98 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.h | 1 +
arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c | 4 ++
3 files changed, 95 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.c
index fdfa1d5..308865c 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.c
@@ -45,6 +45,8 @@
#define OMAP3_STATE_C6 5 /* C6 - MPU OFF + Core RET */
#define OMAP3_STATE_C7 6 /* C7 - MPU OFF + Core OFF */
+#define OMAP3_STATE_MAX OMAP3_STATE_C7
+
struct omap3_processor_cx {
u8 valid;
u8 type;
@@ -128,13 +130,6 @@ static int omap3_enter_idle(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
local_irq_disable();
local_fiq_disable();
- if (!enable_off_mode) {
- if (mpu_state < PWRDM_POWER_RET)
- mpu_state = PWRDM_POWER_RET;
- if (core_state < PWRDM_POWER_RET)
- core_state = PWRDM_POWER_RET;
- }
-
pwrdm_set_next_pwrst(mpu_pd, mpu_state);
pwrdm_set_next_pwrst(core_pd, core_state);
@@ -164,6 +159,65 @@ return_sleep_time:
return (u32)timespec_to_ns(&ts_idle)/1000;
}
+
+/* next_valid_state - Find next valid c-state
+ * @dev: cpuidle device
+ * @state: Currently selected c-state
+ *
+ * If the current state is valid, it is returned back to the caller.
+ * Else, this function searches for a lower c-state which is still
+ * valid (as defined in omap3_power_states[]).
+ */
+static struct cpuidle_state* next_valid_state(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
+ struct cpuidle_state *curr)
+{
+ struct cpuidle_state *next = NULL;
+ struct omap3_processor_cx *cx;
+
+ cx = (struct omap3_processor_cx *)cpuidle_get_statedata(curr);
+
+ /* Check if current state is valid */
+ if (cx->valid) {
+ next = curr;
+ }
+ else {
+ u8 idx = OMAP3_STATE_MAX;
+
+ /* Reach the current state starting at highest C-state */
+ for (; idx >= OMAP3_STATE_C1; idx--) {
+ if (&dev->states[idx] == curr) {
+ next = &dev->states[idx];
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Should never hit this condition.
+ */
+ BUG_ON(next == NULL);
+
+ /* Drop to next valid state.
+ * Start search from the next (lower) state.
+ */
+ idx--;
+ for (; idx >= OMAP3_STATE_C1; idx--) {
+ if (((struct omap3_processor_cx *)
+ cpuidle_get_statedata(
+ &dev->states[idx]))->valid) {
+ next = &dev->states[idx];
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ /*
+ * C1 and C2 are always valid.
+ * So, no need to check for 'next==NULL' outside this loop.
+ */
+ }
+
+ return next;
+}
+
+
/**
* omap3_enter_idle_bm - Checks for any bus activity
* @dev: cpuidle device
@@ -176,7 +230,7 @@ return_sleep_time:
static int omap3_enter_idle_bm(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
struct cpuidle_state *state)
{
- struct cpuidle_state *new_state = state;
+ struct cpuidle_state *new_state= next_valid_state(dev, state);
if ((state->flags & CPUIDLE_FLAG_CHECK_BM) && omap3_idle_bm_check()) {
BUG_ON(!dev->safe_state);
@@ -207,6 +261,32 @@ void omap3_pm_init_cpuidle(struct cpuidle_params *cpuidle_board_params)
return;
}
+/**
+ * omap3_cpuidle_update_states - Update the cpuidle states.
+ *
+ * Currently, this function toggles the validity of idle states based upon
+ * the flag 'enable_off_mode'. When the flag is set all states are valid.
+ * Else, states leading to OFF state set to be invalid.
+ */
+void omap3_cpuidle_update_states(void)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = OMAP3_STATE_C1; i < OMAP3_MAX_STATES; i++) {
+ if (enable_off_mode) {
+ omap3_power_states[i].valid = 1;
+ }
+ else {
+ if ((omap3_power_states[i].mpu_state
+ == PWRDM_POWER_OFF)
+ || (omap3_power_states[i].core_state
+ == PWRDM_POWER_OFF))
+ omap3_power_states[i].valid = 0;
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+
/* omap3_init_power_states - Initialises the OMAP3 specific C states.
*
* Below is the desciption of each C state.
@@ -365,6 +445,8 @@ int __init omap3_idle_init(void)
return -EINVAL;
dev->state_count = count;
+ omap3_cpuidle_update_states();
+
if (cpuidle_register_device(dev)) {
printk(KERN_ERR "%s: CPUidle register device failed\n",
__func__);
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.h b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.h
index b9421e8..9351490 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.h
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.h
@@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ struct cpuidle_params {
extern void omap3_pm_init_vc(struct prm_setup_vc *setup_vc);
#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_IDLE
extern void omap3_pm_init_cpuidle(struct cpuidle_params *cpuidle_board_params);
+extern void omap3_cpuidle_update_states(void);
#else
static inline void omap3_pm_init_cpuidle(
struct cpuidle_params *cpuidle_board_params)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
index 90c4949..d9f0626 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
@@ -981,6 +981,10 @@ void omap3_pm_off_mode_enable(int enable)
else
state = PWRDM_POWER_RET;
+#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_IDLE
+ omap3_cpuidle_update_states();
+#endif
+
#ifdef CONFIG_OMAP_PM_SRF
resource_lock_opp(VDD1_OPP);
resource_lock_opp(VDD2_OPP);
--
1.6.2.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCHv2 1/1] omap3: cpuidle: Update statistics for correct state
2009-11-24 17:50 [PATCHv2 1/1] omap3: cpuidle: Update statistics for correct state Sanjeev Premi
@ 2010-01-25 19:54 ` Kevin Hilman
2010-01-28 17:32 ` Premi, Sanjeev
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Kevin Hilman @ 2010-01-25 19:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sanjeev Premi; +Cc: linux-omap
Sanjeev Premi <premi@ti.com> writes:
> When 'enable_off_mode' is 0, the target power state for MPU
> and CORE was locally changed to PWRDM_POWER_RET but, the
> statistics are updated for idle state originally selected
> by the governor.
>
> This patch 'invalidates' the idle states that lead either of
> MPU or Core to PWRDM_POWER_OFF state when 'enable_off_mode'
> is '0'. The states are valid once 'enable_off_mode' is set
> to '1'.
>
> Added function next_valid_state() to check if current state
> is valid; else get the next valid state. It is called from
> omap3_enter_idle_bm().
>
> Signed-off-by: Sanjeev Premi <premi@ti.com>
Hi Sanjeev,
I quite like this approach, but have a few minor comments. First,
please fix the checkpatch errors and warnings, as well as a few minor
things below...
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.c | 98 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.h | 1 +
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c | 4 ++
> 3 files changed, 95 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.c
> index fdfa1d5..308865c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.c
> @@ -45,6 +45,8 @@
> #define OMAP3_STATE_C6 5 /* C6 - MPU OFF + Core RET */
> #define OMAP3_STATE_C7 6 /* C7 - MPU OFF + Core OFF */
>
> +#define OMAP3_STATE_MAX OMAP3_STATE_C7
> +
> struct omap3_processor_cx {
> u8 valid;
> u8 type;
> @@ -128,13 +130,6 @@ static int omap3_enter_idle(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
> local_irq_disable();
> local_fiq_disable();
>
> - if (!enable_off_mode) {
> - if (mpu_state < PWRDM_POWER_RET)
> - mpu_state = PWRDM_POWER_RET;
> - if (core_state < PWRDM_POWER_RET)
> - core_state = PWRDM_POWER_RET;
> - }
> -
> pwrdm_set_next_pwrst(mpu_pd, mpu_state);
> pwrdm_set_next_pwrst(core_pd, core_state);
>
> @@ -164,6 +159,65 @@ return_sleep_time:
> return (u32)timespec_to_ns(&ts_idle)/1000;
> }
>
> +
> +/* next_valid_state - Find next valid c-state
> + * @dev: cpuidle device
> + * @state: Currently selected c-state
> + *
> + * If the current state is valid, it is returned back to the caller.
> + * Else, this function searches for a lower c-state which is still
> + * valid (as defined in omap3_power_states[]).
> + */
Please fix kerneldoc style. Opening comment should be '/**'
> +static struct cpuidle_state* next_valid_state(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
> + struct cpuidle_state *curr)
> +{
> + struct cpuidle_state *next = NULL;
> + struct omap3_processor_cx *cx;
> +
> + cx = (struct omap3_processor_cx *)cpuidle_get_statedata(curr);
> +
> + /* Check if current state is valid */
> + if (cx->valid) {
> + next = curr;
could just return curr here
> + }
> + else {
> + u8 idx = OMAP3_STATE_MAX;
> +
> + /* Reach the current state starting at highest C-state */
> + for (; idx >= OMAP3_STATE_C1; idx--) {
> + if (&dev->states[idx] == curr) {
> + next = &dev->states[idx];
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * Should never hit this condition.
> + */
> + BUG_ON(next == NULL);
This shouldn't trigger a panic. Please fail more cleanly using WARN_ON()
> + /* Drop to next valid state.
> + * Start search from the next (lower) state.
> + */
fix multiline comment. Should start with '/*' on its own line.
(c.f. Documentation/CodingStyle, search for 'multi-line')
> + idx--;
> + for (; idx >= OMAP3_STATE_C1; idx--) {
> + if (((struct omap3_processor_cx *)
> + cpuidle_get_statedata(
> + &dev->states[idx]))->valid) {
> + next = &dev->states[idx];
> + break;
> + }
> + }
Due to line-wrapping etc., this has readabiliyt problems. Consider this
instead:
for (; idx >= OMAP3_STATE_C1; idx--) {
struct omap3_processor_cx *cx;
cx = cpuidle_get_statedata(&dev->states[idx]);
if (cx->valid) {
next = &dev->states[idx];
break;
}
}
> + /*
> + * C1 and C2 are always valid.
> + * So, no need to check for 'next==NULL' outside this loop.
> + */
> + }
> +
> + return next;
> +}
> +
> +
> /**
> * omap3_enter_idle_bm - Checks for any bus activity
> * @dev: cpuidle device
> @@ -176,7 +230,7 @@ return_sleep_time:
> static int omap3_enter_idle_bm(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
> struct cpuidle_state *state)
> {
> - struct cpuidle_state *new_state = state;
> + struct cpuidle_state *new_state= next_valid_state(dev, state);
^
missing space
>
> if ((state->flags & CPUIDLE_FLAG_CHECK_BM) && omap3_idle_bm_check()) {
> BUG_ON(!dev->safe_state);
> @@ -207,6 +261,32 @@ void omap3_pm_init_cpuidle(struct cpuidle_params *cpuidle_board_params)
> return;
> }
>
> +/**
> + * omap3_cpuidle_update_states - Update the cpuidle states.
> + *
> + * Currently, this function toggles the validity of idle states based upon
> + * the flag 'enable_off_mode'. When the flag is set all states are valid.
> + * Else, states leading to OFF state set to be invalid.
> + */
> +void omap3_cpuidle_update_states(void)
> +{
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = OMAP3_STATE_C1; i < OMAP3_MAX_STATES; i++) {
> + if (enable_off_mode) {
> + omap3_power_states[i].valid = 1;
> + }
> + else {
> + if ((omap3_power_states[i].mpu_state
> + == PWRDM_POWER_OFF)
> + || (omap3_power_states[i].core_state
> + == PWRDM_POWER_OFF))
> + omap3_power_states[i].valid = 0;
> + }
> + }
> +}
more readability problems due to wrapping. consider:
void omap3_cpuidle_update_states(void)
{
int i;
for (i = OMAP3_STATE_C1; i < OMAP3_MAX_STATES; i++) {
struct omap3_processor_cx *cx = &omap3_power_states[i]
if (enable_off_mode)
cx->valid = 1;
else
if ((cx->mpu_state == PWRDM_POWER_OFF) ||
(cx->core_state == PWRDM_POWER_OFF))
cx->valid = 0;
}
}
Kevin
> +
> /* omap3_init_power_states - Initialises the OMAP3 specific C states.
> *
> * Below is the desciption of each C state.
> @@ -365,6 +445,8 @@ int __init omap3_idle_init(void)
> return -EINVAL;
> dev->state_count = count;
>
> + omap3_cpuidle_update_states();
> +
> if (cpuidle_register_device(dev)) {
> printk(KERN_ERR "%s: CPUidle register device failed\n",
> __func__);
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.h b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.h
> index b9421e8..9351490 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.h
> @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ struct cpuidle_params {
> extern void omap3_pm_init_vc(struct prm_setup_vc *setup_vc);
> #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_IDLE
> extern void omap3_pm_init_cpuidle(struct cpuidle_params *cpuidle_board_params);
> +extern void omap3_cpuidle_update_states(void);
> #else
> static inline void omap3_pm_init_cpuidle(
> struct cpuidle_params *cpuidle_board_params)
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
> index 90c4949..d9f0626 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
> @@ -981,6 +981,10 @@ void omap3_pm_off_mode_enable(int enable)
> else
> state = PWRDM_POWER_RET;
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_IDLE
> + omap3_cpuidle_update_states();
> +#endif
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_OMAP_PM_SRF
> resource_lock_opp(VDD1_OPP);
> resource_lock_opp(VDD2_OPP);
> --
> 1.6.2.2
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCHv2 1/1] omap3: cpuidle: Update statistics for correct state
2010-01-25 19:54 ` Kevin Hilman
@ 2010-01-28 17:32 ` Premi, Sanjeev
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Premi, Sanjeev @ 2010-01-28 17:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kevin Hilman; +Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kevin Hilman [mailto:khilman@deeprootsystems.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2010 1:25 AM
> To: Premi, Sanjeev
> Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 1/1] omap3: cpuidle: Update statistics
> for correct state
>
> Sanjeev Premi <premi@ti.com> writes:
>
> > When 'enable_off_mode' is 0, the target power state for MPU
> > and CORE was locally changed to PWRDM_POWER_RET but, the
> > statistics are updated for idle state originally selected
> > by the governor.
> >
> > This patch 'invalidates' the idle states that lead either of
> > MPU or Core to PWRDM_POWER_OFF state when 'enable_off_mode'
> > is '0'. The states are valid once 'enable_off_mode' is set
> > to '1'.
> >
> > Added function next_valid_state() to check if current state
> > is valid; else get the next valid state. It is called from
> > omap3_enter_idle_bm().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sanjeev Premi <premi@ti.com>
>
> Hi Sanjeev,
>
> I quite like this approach, but have a few minor comments. First,
> please fix the checkpatch errors and warnings, as well as a few minor
> things below...
>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.c | 98
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> > arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.h | 1 +
> > arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c | 4 ++
> > 3 files changed, 95 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.c
> b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.c
> > index fdfa1d5..308865c 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.c
> > @@ -45,6 +45,8 @@
> > #define OMAP3_STATE_C6 5 /* C6 - MPU OFF + Core RET */
> > #define OMAP3_STATE_C7 6 /* C7 - MPU OFF + Core OFF */
> >
> > +#define OMAP3_STATE_MAX OMAP3_STATE_C7
> > +
> > struct omap3_processor_cx {
> > u8 valid;
> > u8 type;
> > @@ -128,13 +130,6 @@ static int omap3_enter_idle(struct
> cpuidle_device *dev,
> > local_irq_disable();
> > local_fiq_disable();
> >
> > - if (!enable_off_mode) {
> > - if (mpu_state < PWRDM_POWER_RET)
> > - mpu_state = PWRDM_POWER_RET;
> > - if (core_state < PWRDM_POWER_RET)
> > - core_state = PWRDM_POWER_RET;
> > - }
> > -
> > pwrdm_set_next_pwrst(mpu_pd, mpu_state);
> > pwrdm_set_next_pwrst(core_pd, core_state);
> >
> > @@ -164,6 +159,65 @@ return_sleep_time:
> > return (u32)timespec_to_ns(&ts_idle)/1000;
> > }
> >
> > +
> > +/* next_valid_state - Find next valid c-state
> > + * @dev: cpuidle device
> > + * @state: Currently selected c-state
> > + *
> > + * If the current state is valid, it is returned back to
> the caller.
> > + * Else, this function searches for a lower c-state which is still
> > + * valid (as defined in omap3_power_states[]).
> > + */
>
> Please fix kerneldoc style. Opening comment should be '/**'
>
> > +static struct cpuidle_state* next_valid_state(struct
> cpuidle_device *dev,
> > + struct
> cpuidle_state *curr)
> > +{
> > + struct cpuidle_state *next = NULL;
> > + struct omap3_processor_cx *cx;
> > +
> > + cx = (struct omap3_processor_cx *)cpuidle_get_statedata(curr);
> > +
> > + /* Check if current state is valid */
> > + if (cx->valid) {
> > + next = curr;
>
> could just return curr here
>
> > + }
> > + else {
> > + u8 idx = OMAP3_STATE_MAX;
> > +
> > + /* Reach the current state starting at highest
> C-state */
> > + for (; idx >= OMAP3_STATE_C1; idx--) {
> > + if (&dev->states[idx] == curr) {
> > + next = &dev->states[idx];
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Should never hit this condition.
> > + */
> > + BUG_ON(next == NULL);
>
> This shouldn't trigger a panic. Please fail more cleanly
> using WARN_ON()
>
> > + /* Drop to next valid state.
> > + * Start search from the next (lower) state.
> > + */
>
> fix multiline comment. Should start with '/*' on its own line.
> (c.f. Documentation/CodingStyle, search for 'multi-line')
>
> > + idx--;
> > + for (; idx >= OMAP3_STATE_C1; idx--) {
> > + if (((struct omap3_processor_cx *)
> > + cpuidle_get_statedata(
> > + &dev->states[idx]))->valid) {
> > + next = &dev->states[idx];
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + }
>
> Due to line-wrapping etc., this has readabiliyt problems.
> Consider this
> instead:
>
> for (; idx >= OMAP3_STATE_C1; idx--) {
> struct omap3_processor_cx *cx;
>
> cx = cpuidle_get_statedata(&dev->states[idx]);
> if (cx->valid) {
> next = &dev->states[idx];
> break;
> }
> }
>
> > + /*
> > + * C1 and C2 are always valid.
> > + * So, no need to check for 'next==NULL'
> outside this loop.
> > + */
> > + }
> > +
> > + return next;
> > +}
> > +
> > +
> > /**
> > * omap3_enter_idle_bm - Checks for any bus activity
> > * @dev: cpuidle device
> > @@ -176,7 +230,7 @@ return_sleep_time:
> > static int omap3_enter_idle_bm(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
> > struct cpuidle_state *state)
> > {
> > - struct cpuidle_state *new_state = state;
> > + struct cpuidle_state *new_state= next_valid_state(dev, state);
> ^
>
> missing space
>
> >
> > if ((state->flags & CPUIDLE_FLAG_CHECK_BM) &&
> omap3_idle_bm_check()) {
> > BUG_ON(!dev->safe_state);
> > @@ -207,6 +261,32 @@ void omap3_pm_init_cpuidle(struct
> cpuidle_params *cpuidle_board_params)
> > return;
> > }
> >
> > +/**
> > + * omap3_cpuidle_update_states - Update the cpuidle states.
> > + *
> > + * Currently, this function toggles the validity of idle
> states based upon
> > + * the flag 'enable_off_mode'. When the flag is set all
> states are valid.
> > + * Else, states leading to OFF state set to be invalid.
> > + */
> > +void omap3_cpuidle_update_states(void)
> > +{
> > + int i;
> > +
> > + for (i = OMAP3_STATE_C1; i < OMAP3_MAX_STATES; i++) {
> > + if (enable_off_mode) {
> > + omap3_power_states[i].valid = 1;
> > + }
> > + else {
> > + if ((omap3_power_states[i].mpu_state
> > + == PWRDM_POWER_OFF)
> > + || (omap3_power_states[i].core_state
> > + == PWRDM_POWER_OFF))
> > + omap3_power_states[i].valid = 0;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +}
>
> more readability problems due to wrapping. consider:
>
> void omap3_cpuidle_update_states(void)
> {
> int i;
>
> for (i = OMAP3_STATE_C1; i < OMAP3_MAX_STATES; i++) {
> struct omap3_processor_cx *cx = &omap3_power_states[i]
>
> if (enable_off_mode)
> cx->valid = 1;
> else
> if ((cx->mpu_state == PWRDM_POWER_OFF) ||
> (cx->core_state == PWRDM_POWER_OFF))
> cx->valid = 0;
> }
> }
>
> Kevin
Thanks for comments Kevin.
Updated just started to test the updated patch. Will be posting soon.
Best regards,
Sanjeev
>
>
> > +
> > /* omap3_init_power_states - Initialises the OMAP3
> specific C states.
> > *
> > * Below is the desciption of each C state.
> > @@ -365,6 +445,8 @@ int __init omap3_idle_init(void)
> > return -EINVAL;
> > dev->state_count = count;
> >
> > + omap3_cpuidle_update_states();
> > +
> > if (cpuidle_register_device(dev)) {
> > printk(KERN_ERR "%s: CPUidle register device failed\n",
> > __func__);
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.h b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.h
> > index b9421e8..9351490 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.h
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.h
> > @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ struct cpuidle_params {
> > extern void omap3_pm_init_vc(struct prm_setup_vc *setup_vc);
> > #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_IDLE
> > extern void omap3_pm_init_cpuidle(struct cpuidle_params
> *cpuidle_board_params);
> > +extern void omap3_cpuidle_update_states(void);
> > #else
> > static inline void omap3_pm_init_cpuidle(
> > struct cpuidle_params *cpuidle_board_params)
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
> b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
> > index 90c4949..d9f0626 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
> > @@ -981,6 +981,10 @@ void omap3_pm_off_mode_enable(int enable)
> > else
> > state = PWRDM_POWER_RET;
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_IDLE
> > + omap3_cpuidle_update_states();
> > +#endif
> > +
> > #ifdef CONFIG_OMAP_PM_SRF
> > resource_lock_opp(VDD1_OPP);
> > resource_lock_opp(VDD2_OPP);
> > --
> > 1.6.2.2
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
> linux-omap" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-01-28 17:32 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-11-24 17:50 [PATCHv2 1/1] omap3: cpuidle: Update statistics for correct state Sanjeev Premi
2010-01-25 19:54 ` Kevin Hilman
2010-01-28 17:32 ` Premi, Sanjeev
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox