public inbox for linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
To: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@dowhile0.org>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
	Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>,
	linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] ARM: OMAP3: PM: don't explicitly enable the IO-chain interrupt
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 07:55:02 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87obo2mg61.fsf@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1340933123-30401-1-git-send-email-javier@dowhile0.org> (Javier Martinez Canillas's message of "Fri, 29 Jun 2012 03:25:23 +0200")

+Paul

Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@dowhile0.org> writes:

> commit 99b59df0 ARM: OMAP3: PM: fix shared PRCM interrupt leave disabled at boot
>
> set the IRQ_NOAUTOEN flag to the PCRM IO-chain irq to avoid this
> interrupt until the PM core code is ready to handle the interrupts.
>
> It seems that this is not needed anymore after the OMAP PRCM I/O chain
> code re-implementation introduced on merge commit:
>
> 9a17d88 Merge tag 'omap-devel-c-for-3.6' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/
>
> The IRQ_NOAUTOEN flags is not set for the PRCM I/O irq anymore on the
> new implementation. This has the effect that a request_irq() for the
> PRCM I/O chain irq will auto-enable the requested IRQ and a later call
> to enable_irq() will lead to the following warning:

I noticed that warning too, but I don't think $SUBJECT patch is the
right fix.

We still need the IRQ_NOAUTOEN so that cases where PM is not enabled,
the IO chain interrupts are not enabled.

Looking closer, it looks like the merge of omap-devel-c-for-3.6 removed
the IRQ_NOAUTOEN in the merge resolution, which wasn't right.

I'll cook up a fix for this.

Kevin



  reply	other threads:[~2012-06-29 12:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-06-29  1:25 [PATCH 1/1] ARM: OMAP3: PM: don't explicitly enable the IO-chain interrupt Javier Martinez Canillas
2012-06-29 12:55 ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2012-06-29 13:25   ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2012-06-29 14:07     ` Kevin Hilman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87obo2mg61.fsf@ti.com \
    --to=khilman@ti.com \
    --cc=javier@dowhile0.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=paul@pwsan.com \
    --cc=t-kristo@ti.com \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox