From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
To: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@dowhile0.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] ARM: OMAP3: PM: don't explicitly enable the IO-chain interrupt
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 07:55:02 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87obo2mg61.fsf@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1340933123-30401-1-git-send-email-javier@dowhile0.org> (Javier Martinez Canillas's message of "Fri, 29 Jun 2012 03:25:23 +0200")
+Paul
Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@dowhile0.org> writes:
> commit 99b59df0 ARM: OMAP3: PM: fix shared PRCM interrupt leave disabled at boot
>
> set the IRQ_NOAUTOEN flag to the PCRM IO-chain irq to avoid this
> interrupt until the PM core code is ready to handle the interrupts.
>
> It seems that this is not needed anymore after the OMAP PRCM I/O chain
> code re-implementation introduced on merge commit:
>
> 9a17d88 Merge tag 'omap-devel-c-for-3.6' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/
>
> The IRQ_NOAUTOEN flags is not set for the PRCM I/O irq anymore on the
> new implementation. This has the effect that a request_irq() for the
> PRCM I/O chain irq will auto-enable the requested IRQ and a later call
> to enable_irq() will lead to the following warning:
I noticed that warning too, but I don't think $SUBJECT patch is the
right fix.
We still need the IRQ_NOAUTOEN so that cases where PM is not enabled,
the IO chain interrupts are not enabled.
Looking closer, it looks like the merge of omap-devel-c-for-3.6 removed
the IRQ_NOAUTOEN in the merge resolution, which wasn't right.
I'll cook up a fix for this.
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-29 12:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-29 1:25 [PATCH 1/1] ARM: OMAP3: PM: don't explicitly enable the IO-chain interrupt Javier Martinez Canillas
2012-06-29 12:55 ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2012-06-29 13:25 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2012-06-29 14:07 ` Kevin Hilman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87obo2mg61.fsf@ti.com \
--to=khilman@ti.com \
--cc=javier@dowhile0.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=paul@pwsan.com \
--cc=t-kristo@ti.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox