From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: arno@natisbad.org (Arnaud Ebalard) Subject: Re: N8x0 to mainline patches Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 09:23:49 +0200 Message-ID: <87ocrfhl6i.fsf@small.ssi.corp> References: <200907191600.23502.luke@dashjr.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from copper.chdir.org ([88.191.97.87]:49287 "EHLO copper.chdir.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752611AbZGTHXQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Jul 2009 03:23:16 -0400 In-Reply-To: <200907191600.23502.luke@dashjr.org> (Luke-Jr's message of "Sun, 19 Jul 2009 16:00:19 -0500") Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Luke-Jr Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Hi, "Luke-Jr" writes: >> When the rx44 keymap support is added back in your quilt set, can we >> discuss it. IIRC, the same kind of value (i.e. > 255) is also in the >> rx-51. Any specific reason? > > I presume the reason is that the "standard" code for the "Fn" key is 464... so > it is only correct to map "Fn" to KEY_FN. ;) I know, but from the document I read on the topic, xorg does not support keycode value higher than 255. I must definitely be missing something. > There is a software Fn key on some Mac laptops as well. Do they work? Why/how? My old laptop was a powerbook 12" running Debian and that key never worked, IIRC. > Note: before I installed KDE 4 on my N810, Fn was working in X with its usual > keycode... If you manage to find out why/how it worked at some point, I am interested. Cheers, a+