From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
To: Grazvydas Ignotas <notasas@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>,
Igor Grinberg <grinberg@compulab.co.il>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio/omap: fix off-mode bug: clear debounce clock enable mask on disable
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 07:19:13 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87pq4854wu.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANOLnOOUHJg5W9VbHhnK8ta+Bys_oMpSz9M5jQ0xCeOB1gxtdg@mail.gmail.com> (Grazvydas Ignotas's message of "Wed, 24 Oct 2012 15:02:30 +0300")
Grazvydas Ignotas <notasas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 9:09 PM, Kevin Hilman
> <khilman@deeprootsystems.com> wrote:
>> From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
>>
>> When debounce clocks are disabled, ensure that the banks
>> dbck_enable_mask is cleared also. Otherwise, context restore on
>> subsequent off-mode transition will restore previous value from the
>> shadow copies (bank->context.debounce*) leading to mismatch state
>> between driver state and hardware state.
>
> This doesn't look right to me, aren't you effectively disabling
> debounce forever here? _gpio_dbck_disable is called from
> omap_gpio_runtime_suspend() and nothing will ever restore
> dbck_enable_mask back to what it was set by _set_gpio_debounce and
> debounce functionality is lost.
Yes, you're right. Good catch.
I need a fix that's more targetted to the free/reset path.
Linus, please revert if it's not too late, and I'll come up with a more
targetted fix.
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-24 14:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-23 18:09 [PATCH] gpio/omap: fix off-mode bug: clear debounce clock enable mask on disable Kevin Hilman
2012-10-23 19:09 ` Felipe Balbi
2012-10-23 22:00 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-10-24 7:39 ` Felipe Balbi
2012-10-24 7:33 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2012-10-24 8:16 ` Linus Walleij
2012-10-24 8:56 ` Igor Grinberg
2012-10-24 12:02 ` Grazvydas Ignotas
2012-10-24 12:49 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2012-10-24 13:40 ` Grazvydas Ignotas
2012-10-24 14:19 ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2012-10-24 14:38 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2012-10-26 7:21 ` Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87pq4854wu.fsf@deeprootsystems.com \
--to=khilman@deeprootsystems.com \
--cc=balbi@ti.com \
--cc=grinberg@compulab.co.il \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=notasas@gmail.com \
--cc=paul@pwsan.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).