From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
To: "Woodruff, Richard" <r-woodruff2@ti.com>
Cc: Koen Kooi <koen@beagleboard.org>,
"linux-omap@vger.kernel.org List" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Beagle PM hangs
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 15:21:57 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87pri4gz1m.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <13B9B4C6EF24D648824FF11BE89671620376E9A684@dlee02.ent.ti.com> (Richard Woodruff's message of "Fri\, 30 Jan 2009 16\:49\:34 -0600")
"Woodruff, Richard" <r-woodruff2@ti.com> writes:
>>In fact, you wouldn't even need a custom governor.
>> To avoid governor picking overdrive OPP:
>>
>> # echo 550000 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_max_freq
>>
>> To allow overdrive:
>>
>> # echo 600000 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_max_freq
>
> Sure. Now is someone going to fix up every root file system which users have around.
I'm not suggesting this as the standard way. The point was to say
that a custom governor is not the only way.
> It would be better to init the limit in the driver for this version of OMAP.
Agreed.
CPUfreq policy is just as easily set in the kernel at init time. Then
the default would be set right, and the rootfs would be left to change
it if desired.
Kevin
> Even if you do that someone still needs to turn on and off the limit
> dynamically or create a custom governor.
>
> Until that kind of smart control is pervasive it is safer to just put the interface a layer down for expert use.
>
> But like I was saying, people are free to set the clock to what ever they want. On a properly characterized part it might even be safe for many years. A 3440 will sit well above 600MHz in nominal.
>
> Regards,
> Richard W.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-30 23:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <345163910901280814nb847b34pca50f4ee6e49929d@mail.gmail.com>
2009-01-28 16:28 ` Beagle PM hangs Kevin Hilman
2009-01-28 17:46 ` Kevin Hilman
2009-01-30 14:16 ` Sriram V
2009-01-30 14:34 ` Woodruff, Richard
2009-01-30 17:12 ` Kevin Hilman
2009-01-30 19:41 ` Pandita, Vikram
2009-01-30 19:53 ` Kevin Hilman
2009-01-30 21:31 ` Woodruff, Richard
2009-02-02 5:00 ` Nayak, Rajendra
2009-01-30 21:34 ` Koen Kooi
2009-01-30 22:03 ` Woodruff, Richard
2009-01-30 22:09 ` Koen Kooi
2009-01-30 22:39 ` Kevin Hilman
2009-01-30 22:49 ` Woodruff, Richard
2009-01-30 23:21 ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2009-01-31 11:18 ` Igor Stoppa
2009-01-30 22:40 ` Woodruff, Richard
2009-01-29 17:20 ` Peter Reid
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87pri4gz1m.fsf@deeprootsystems.com \
--to=khilman@deeprootsystems.com \
--cc=koen@beagleboard.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=r-woodruff2@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox