From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kevin Hilman Subject: Re: [PATCHv7 07/12] ARM: OMAP4: PM: put all domains to OSWR during suspend Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 16:11:37 -0700 Message-ID: <87sjamsuom.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> References: <1342704392-23657-1-git-send-email-t-kristo@ti.com> <1342704392-23657-8-git-send-email-t-kristo@ti.com> <1342711907.4672.153.camel@sokoban> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-ob0-f174.google.com ([209.85.214.174]:55829 "EHLO mail-ob0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751017Ab2ILXLi (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Sep 2012 19:11:38 -0400 Received: by obbuo13 with SMTP id uo13so3531226obb.19 for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 16:11:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Paul Walmsley's message of "Thu, 19 Jul 2012 17:30:12 -0600 (MDT)") Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Paul Walmsley Cc: Tero Kristo , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, nm@ti.com, rnayak@ti.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Paul Walmsley writes: [...] > > It kind of looks to me like there are two or three separate sets within > the series. My feeling is that Kevin should take the first two, then I > should take the rest other than 6 and 7. Then once those are queued, > we can pull in 6 and 7. Does that make sense to you? > Looks like 1, 2 & 7 are needed for OSWR, and the rest can go now via Paul. Tero, can create a new OSWR series including 1, 2 & 7? Can you also refresh it against Jean's latest functional power state series (v6)? Thanks, Kevin