From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kevin Hilman Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH V6 0/4] cpuidle: Global registration of idle states with per-cpu statistics Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 12:45:32 -0700 Message-ID: <87ty84tl7n.fsf@ti.com> References: <20110922082840.10520.85895.stgit@localhost6.localdomain6> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from na3sys009aog125.obsmtp.com ([74.125.149.153]:52336 "EHLO na3sys009aog125.obsmtp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753727Ab1IVTpi (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Sep 2011 15:45:38 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20110922082840.10520.85895.stgit@localhost6.localdomain6> (Deepthi Dharwar's message of "Thu, 22 Sep 2011 13:58:52 +0530") Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Deepthi Dharwar Cc: venki@google.com, ak@linux.intel.com, len.brown@intel.com, peterz@infradead.org, santosh.shilimkar@ti.com, arjan@linux.intel.com, lenb@kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Deepthi Dharwar writes: > The following patch series implements global registration of cpuidle > states, and also has the necessary data structure changes to > accommodate the per-cpu writable members of the cpuidle_states > structure. I reviewed earlier versions of the series, and this version still looks good to me. Any reason it is still RFC? Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman and for the OMAP-specific parts, Acked-by: Kevin Hilman Kevin