From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
To: "Govindraj.R" <govindraj.raja@ti.com>
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com>, Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>,
Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] OMAP2+: mux: Enable wakeup for wakeup enable requested pads
Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2011 17:57:55 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87tyfi49cs.fsf@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87lj0u8mrf.fsf@ti.com> (Kevin Hilman's message of "Fri, 04 Mar 2011 15:54:44 -0800")
Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com> writes:
> "Govindraj.R" <govindraj.raja@ti.com> writes:
[...]
>> /* Assumes the calling function takes care of locking */
>> void omap_hwmod_mux(struct omap_hwmod_mux_info *hmux, u8 state)
>> {
>> @@ -342,6 +365,9 @@ void omap_hwmod_mux(struct omap_hwmod_mux_info *hmux, u8 state)
>> break;
>> flags &= ~OMAP_DEVICE_PAD_ENABLED;
>> val = pad->idle;
>> + if (flags & OMAP_DEVICE_PAD_WAKEUP)
>> + val |= OMAP_WAKEUP_EN;
>> +
>
> Is this needed on every idle transition?
>
> You're currently setting it on every idle transition, but never clearing
> it. If it is to be a one-time thing, then move it to the early init of
> the mux.
Just to clarify...
So as soon as the hwmod is first idled, IO-ring wakeups are enabled for
any pads that have OMAP_DEVICE_PAD_WAKEUP.
The problem here (compared with behavior of existing code) is that there
is no provision for disabling IO-ring wakeups.
For example, with current code, you can disable wakeups from userspace
using the sysfs control file /sys/devices/.../power/wakeup, whose value
can be checked using device_may_wakeup(), like current
mach-omap2/serial.c code does.
With this patch, IO-ring wakeups are always enabled, and never disabled.
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-05 1:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-02 11:12 [PATCH 2/7] OMAP2+: mux: Enable wakeup for wakeup enable requested pads Govindraj.R
2011-03-04 23:54 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-03-05 1:57 ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2011-03-08 11:44 ` Govindraj
2011-03-08 17:26 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-03-08 18:31 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-03-08 19:16 ` Paul Walmsley
2011-03-08 19:21 ` Paul Walmsley
2011-03-09 12:06 ` Govindraj
2011-03-08 12:19 ` Govindraj
2011-03-09 1:14 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-03-09 14:45 ` Govindraj
2011-03-05 1:27 ` Kevin Hilman
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-02-28 14:39 [PATCH 0/7] OMAP2+: UART: runtime conversion + cleanup Govindraj.R
2011-02-28 14:39 ` [PATCH 2/7] OMAP2+: mux: Enable wakeup for wakeup enable requested pads Govindraj.R
2011-03-02 4:49 ` Varadarajan, Charulatha
2011-03-02 10:40 ` Govindraj
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87tyfi49cs.fsf@ti.com \
--to=khilman@ti.com \
--cc=b-cousson@ti.com \
--cc=govindraj.raja@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@pwsan.com \
--cc=rnayak@ti.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox