From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
To: Silesh C V <saileshcv@gmail.com>
Cc: Govindraj <govindraj.ti@gmail.com>, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] OMAP: PM: CPUFREQ: Fix conditional compilation
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 12:17:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87tyl9d6en.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=kajdYN9rbdjH_9q6E5RLuy_oj-4Xsk-X6sFRg@mail.gmail.com> (Silesh C. V.'s message of "Mon, 27 Sep 2010 14:18:59 +0530")
Silesh C V <saileshcv@gmail.com> writes:
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Govindraj <govindraj.ti@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 11:49 AM, Silesh C V <silesh@ti.com> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 8:36 PM, Kevin Hilman
>>> <khilman@deeprootsystems.com> wrote:
>>>> Silesh C V <silesh@ti.com> writes:
>>>>
>>>>> Fix conditional compilation.
>>>>
>>>> What excatly was the compile error? and with which compiler?
>>>
>>> There is no compiler error.But what we need after an #elif is a
>>> conditional expression.
>>> The correct usage is #elif defined(CONFIG_XXX) rather than #elif CONFIG_XXX.
>>>
>>> Further, if the kernel is configured for a non-omap3 arch (eg.OMAP4),
>>> you get a compiler warning:
>>> arch/arm/plat-omap/cpu-omap.c:47:7: warning: "CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP3" is not defined
>>> which goes away with this patch.
>>>
>>
>> Silesh,
>>
>> which defconfig are you using with multi omap-build defconfig(omap3_defconfig)
>>
>> CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP3 will be enabled. So this compilation error will not occur.
>>
>> ---
>> Regards,
>> Govindraj.R
>>
>>
>
> As I said before there is no compilation error. But what we have to
> check for is whether CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP3 is defined or not.
> Not for the value of CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP3. We have to check for value of
> defined (CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP3). Otherwise compiler searches for the value
> of the macro and hence the warning(comes with a omap4 config).See how
> #elif + CONFIG_XXX is used elsewhere in kernel.
I see what you're saying now. The current #elif clause will *always* be
true.
You'll notice that all of this confusion would not have happened if the
original changelog described the problem in detail, showing that that
#elif clause will always be true, and especially not calling it a
compliation fix.
Please re-post with a better changelog and I will incoporate into the
pm-cpufreq sub-branch of the PM branch.
Thanks,
Kevin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-28 19:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-24 8:54 [PATCH] OMAP: PM: CPUFREQ: Fix conditional compilation Silesh C V
2010-09-24 15:06 ` Kevin Hilman
2010-09-27 6:19 ` Silesh C V
2010-09-27 7:30 ` Govindraj
2010-09-27 8:48 ` Silesh C V
2010-09-28 19:17 ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2010-09-29 5:27 ` Silesh C V
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87tyl9d6en.fsf@deeprootsystems.com \
--to=khilman@deeprootsystems.com \
--cc=govindraj.ti@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=saileshcv@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).