Re: [PM-WIP-OPP][PATCH 1/4] omap3: pm: cpufreq: BUG_ON cleanup

[Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>]

Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> writes:

> BUG_ON should not ideally contain a functional code. Remove it out.

True.  But this code should not be using BUG_ON() in the first place.

We should not crash the whole kernel in this case, just fail
with a warning.

If you're cleaning this up, can you make it fail more gracefully.

Kevin


> Ref: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=109391212925546&w=2
>
> Cc: Ambresh K <ambresh@ti.com>
> Cc: Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com>
> Cc: Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@nokia.com>
> Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
> Cc: Phil Carmody <ext-phil.2.carmody@nokia.com>
> Cc: Sanjeev Premi <premi@ti.com>
> Cc: Tero Kristo <tero.kristo@nokia.com>
> Cc: Thara Gopinath <thara@ti.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpufreq34xx.c |    8 +++++---
>  1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpufreq34xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpufreq34xx.c
> index c453ec5..f0ed3ae 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpufreq34xx.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpufreq34xx.c
> @@ -111,6 +111,7 @@ static struct omap_opp_def __initdata omap36xx_dsp_rate_table[] = {
>  
>  void __init omap3_pm_init_opp_table(void)
>  {
> +	int r;
>  	struct omap_opp_def **omap3_opp_def_list;
>  	struct omap_opp_def *omap34xx_opp_def_list[] = {
>  		omap34xx_mpu_rate_table,
> @@ -126,8 +127,9 @@ void __init omap3_pm_init_opp_table(void)
>  	omap3_opp_def_list = cpu_is_omap3630() ? omap36xx_opp_def_list :
>  				omap34xx_opp_def_list;
>  
> -	BUG_ON(opp_init_list(OPP_MPU, omap3_opp_def_list[0]));
> -	BUG_ON(opp_init_list(OPP_L3, omap3_opp_def_list[1]));
> -	BUG_ON(opp_init_list(OPP_DSP, omap3_opp_def_list[2]));
> +	r = opp_init_list(OPP_MPU, omap3_opp_def_list[0]);
> +	r |= opp_init_list(OPP_L3, omap3_opp_def_list[1]);
> +	r |= opp_init_list(OPP_DSP, omap3_opp_def_list[2]);
> +	BUG_ON(r);
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 1.6.3.3