From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
To: "Govindraj.R" <govindraj.raja@ti.com>
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-serial@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tty: omap-serial: Keep the wakeup mechanism enabled by default
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 16:25:45 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87vckyq6ti.fsf@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1334579407-16970-1-git-send-email-govindraj.raja@ti.com> (Govindraj R.'s message of "Mon, 16 Apr 2012 18:00:07 +0530")
"Govindraj.R" <govindraj.raja@ti.com> writes:
> From: "Govindraj.R" <govindraj.raja@ti.com>
>
> The wakeups can be left enabled by default and should be disabled
> only when disabled from sysfs and while entering suspend.
Left enabled? That assumes something else has initizlied them, but we
can't make that assumption.
First, wakeups should be disabled when ->probe has finished. Then,
they should be enabled whenever driver is in use, and disabled when
the driver is not in use.
I'm not familiar enough with uart_ops, but it looks like they should
probably be enabled in uart_ops->startup and disabled in
uart_ops->shutdown.
I've hacked up a test patch[1] which was required for module-wakeups to
work for me. I tested module-level wakeups by disabling all C-states
except C1 using the new sysfs control for disabling C-states[2].
More comments below...
> Thanks to Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com> for suggesting this.
> Discussion References:
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-omap/msg67764.html
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-omap/msg67838.html
>
> Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
> Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
> Signed-off-by: Govindraj.R <govindraj.raja@ti.com>
> ---
> drivers/tty/serial/omap-serial.c | 30 +++++++++++-------------------
> 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/omap-serial.c b/drivers/tty/serial/omap-serial.c
> index d00b38e..4a92447 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/omap-serial.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/omap-serial.c
> @@ -930,13 +930,6 @@ serial_omap_pm(struct uart_port *port, unsigned int state,
> serial_out(up, UART_EFR, efr);
> serial_out(up, UART_LCR, 0);
>
> - if (!device_may_wakeup(&up->pdev->dev)) {
> - if (!state)
> - pm_runtime_forbid(&up->pdev->dev);
> - else
> - pm_runtime_allow(&up->pdev->dev);
> - }
> -
> pm_runtime_put(&up->pdev->dev);
> }
>
> @@ -1184,10 +1177,16 @@ static struct uart_driver serial_omap_reg = {
> static int serial_omap_suspend(struct device *dev)
> {
> struct uart_omap_port *up = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> + struct omap_uart_port_info *pdata = dev->platform_data;
>
> if (up) {
> uart_suspend_port(&serial_omap_reg, &up->port);
> flush_work_sync(&up->qos_work);
> +
> + if (!device_may_wakeup(dev)) {
> + pdata->enable_wakeup(up->pdev, false);
Should check for the presence of pdata->enable_wakeup() before calling.
Same thing below.
> + up->wakeups_enabled = false;
> + }
> }
>
> return 0;
> @@ -1582,18 +1581,6 @@ static int serial_omap_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
> if (pdata->get_context_loss_count)
> up->context_loss_cnt = pdata->get_context_loss_count(dev);
>
> - if (device_may_wakeup(dev)) {
> - if (!up->wakeups_enabled) {
> - pdata->enable_wakeup(up->pdev, true);
> - up->wakeups_enabled = true;
> - }
> - } else {
> - if (up->wakeups_enabled) {
> - pdata->enable_wakeup(up->pdev, false);
> - up->wakeups_enabled = false;
> - }
> - }
> -
> /* Errata i291 */
> if (up->use_dma && pdata->set_forceidle &&
> (up->errata & UART_ERRATA_i291_DMA_FORCEIDLE))
> @@ -1618,6 +1605,11 @@ static int serial_omap_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
> serial_omap_restore_context(up);
> }
>
> + if (!up->wakeups_enabled) {
> + pdata->enable_wakeup(up->pdev, true);
> + up->wakeups_enabled = true;
> + }
You put the disable in ->suspend, but the enable in ->runtime_resume.
Doesn't this belong in ->resume ?
Kevin
> /* Errata i291 */
> if (up->use_dma && pdata->set_noidle &&
> (up->errata & UART_ERRATA_i291_DMA_FORCEIDLE))
[1] Feel free to fold this into your original patch.
>From 8a4a24998aaf35240f0010b172537da64351a7d6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 16:24:05 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] omap-serial: fix default wakeup settings
---
drivers/tty/serial/omap-serial.c | 10 ++++++++++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/omap-serial.c b/drivers/tty/serial/omap-serial.c
index 4a92447..6458ec9 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/serial/omap-serial.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/serial/omap-serial.c
@@ -511,6 +511,7 @@ static void serial_omap_break_ctl(struct uart_port *port, int break_state)
static int serial_omap_startup(struct uart_port *port)
{
struct uart_omap_port *up = (struct uart_omap_port *)port;
+ struct omap_uart_port_info *pdata = up->pdev->dev.platform_data;
unsigned long flags = 0;
int retval;
@@ -525,6 +526,9 @@ static int serial_omap_startup(struct uart_port *port)
dev_dbg(up->port.dev, "serial_omap_startup+%d\n", up->port.line);
pm_runtime_get_sync(&up->pdev->dev);
+ if (pdata->enable_wakeup)
+ pdata->enable_wakeup(up->pdev, true);
+
/*
* Clear the FIFO buffers and disable them.
* (they will be reenabled in set_termios())
@@ -589,6 +593,7 @@ static int serial_omap_startup(struct uart_port *port)
static void serial_omap_shutdown(struct uart_port *port)
{
struct uart_omap_port *up = (struct uart_omap_port *)port;
+ struct omap_uart_port_info *pdata = up->pdev->dev.platform_data;
unsigned long flags = 0;
dev_dbg(up->port.dev, "serial_omap_shutdown+%d\n", up->port.line);
@@ -628,6 +633,8 @@ static void serial_omap_shutdown(struct uart_port *port)
up->uart_dma.rx_buf = NULL;
}
+ if (pdata->enable_wakeup)
+ pdata->enable_wakeup(up->pdev, false);
pm_runtime_put(&up->pdev->dev);
free_irq(up->port.irq, up);
}
@@ -1475,6 +1482,9 @@ static int serial_omap_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (ret != 0)
goto err_add_port;
+ if (omap_up_info->enable_wakeup)
+ omap_up_info->enable_wakeup(pdev, false);
+
pm_runtime_put(&pdev->dev);
platform_set_drvdata(pdev, up);
return 0;
--
1.7.9.2
[1] shell snippit for disabling C-states
# CPUidle: disable everything but C1
cd /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpuidle
for state in state[1-6]*; do
if [ -e ${state} ]; then
echo 1 > cat ${state}/disable
fi
done
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-17 23:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-16 12:30 [PATCH] tty: omap-serial: Keep the wakeup mechanism enabled by default Govindraj.R
2012-04-17 23:25 ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2012-04-18 13:16 ` Raja, Govindraj
2012-04-18 14:21 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-04-18 15:02 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-04-18 19:08 ` Alan Cox
2012-04-19 14:30 ` Raja, Govindraj
2012-04-20 9:13 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87vckyq6ti.fsf@ti.com \
--to=khilman@ti.com \
--cc=govindraj.raja@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@pwsan.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox