public inbox for linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
To: "Basak, Partha" <p-basak2@ti.com>
Cc: "paul@pwsan.com" <paul@pwsan.com>,
	"Kalliguddi, Hema" <hemahk@ti.com>,
	"Nayak, Rajendra" <rnayak@ti.com>,
	"linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: On the APIs for Enabling and Disabling Wakeup capability.
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 17:25:36 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87vd9isdxb.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <B85A65D85D7EB246BE421B3FB0FBB59301E75F0BBF@dbde02.ent.ti.com> (Partha Basak's message of "Wed\, 16 Jun 2010 20\:09\:53 +0530")

"Basak, Partha" <p-basak2@ti.com> writes:

> I wanted to close on the introduction of two new OMAP device APIs
> omap_device_enable_wakeup () & omap_device_disable_wakeup() in
> omap_device layer.
>
> These APIs are potentially needed by the USB driver (via function
> pointers) to work around some USB erratum.
>
> Alternatively, can we call omap_hwmod_enable_wakeup() via function
> pointer?  Is it agreeable to call these from driver code (via
> function pointers)in some special cases such as to handle some
> errata?

Hi Partha,

First, we need to dig up the Errata details for that USB problem to
better understand the USB-specific issue.

In addition, Paul and I discussed the option of automatically managing
the wakeup during the hwmod enable/idle, since there isn't really a
need to have the wakeup enabled when the hwmod is active.

Do you see any disadvantages to that?  That would be much cleaner than
manually managing the wakeup feature per-driver.

Kevin

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-06-17  0:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-06-16 14:39 On the APIs for Enabling and Disabling Wakeup capability Basak, Partha
2010-06-16 14:58 ` Basak, Partha
2010-06-17  0:25 ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2010-06-17  3:42   ` Kalliguddi, Hema
2010-06-17  9:34     ` Cousson, Benoit
2010-06-18  8:59       ` Kalliguddi, Hema
2010-06-18 14:58         ` Kevin Hilman
2010-06-22 10:29           ` Basak, Partha
2010-06-23 20:31             ` Kevin Hilman
2010-06-24 14:54               ` Kalliguddi, Hema
2010-06-24 15:04                 ` Basak, Partha
2010-06-28 14:25                 ` Kalliguddi, Hema
2010-06-28 16:25                   ` Kevin Hilman
2010-06-24 14:42           ` Kalliguddi, Hema
2010-06-27  3:05     ` David Brownell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87vd9isdxb.fsf@deeprootsystems.com \
    --to=khilman@deeprootsystems.com \
    --cc=hemahk@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=p-basak2@ti.com \
    --cc=paul@pwsan.com \
    --cc=rnayak@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox