From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kevin Hilman Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP: Use the correct CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP24XX Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2007 10:49:29 -0800 Message-ID: <87ve7birpi.fsf@vence.hilman.org> References: <20071206014651.GA15983@party> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20071206014651.GA15983@party> (Kyungmin Park's message of "Thu\, 6 Dec 2007 10\:46\:51 +0900") List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-omap-open-source-bounces@linux.omap.com Errors-To: linux-omap-open-source-bounces@linux.omap.com To: Kyungmin Park Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap-open-source@linux.omap.com List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Kyungmin Park writes: > Use the correct CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP24XX. > It boots on locked SRAM board. > > Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park > --- > diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/sram.c b/arch/arm/plat-omap/sram.c > index afe8181..6305dc9 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/sram.c > +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/sram.c > @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ static int is_sram_locked(void) > { > int type = 0; > > -#if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP242X) > +#if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP24XX) > if (cpu_is_omap242x()) > type = (ctrl_read_reg(OMAP24XX_CONTROL_STATUS) & > OMAP2_DEVICETYPE_MASK); Shouldn't the cpu_is_omap242x be changed to cpu_is_omap24xx also so this works on 2430? Kevin