linux-omap.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>
To: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Richard Woodruff <r-woodruff2@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: OMAP2xxx: PM: enter WFI via inline asm if CORE stays active
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 07:28:41 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wqudv9ee.fsf@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1302062119540.12769@utopia.booyaka.com> (Paul Walmsley's message of "Wed, 6 Feb 2013 21:21:59 +0000 (UTC)")

Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com> writes:

> On Sun, 30 Dec 2012, Paul Walmsley wrote:
>
>> There shouldn't be any need to jump to SRAM code if the OMAP CORE
>> clockdomain (and consequently the SDRAM controller and CORE PLL) stays
>> active during MPU WFI.  The SRAM code should only be needed when the RAM
>> enters self-refresh.  So in the case where CORE stays active, just call
>> WFI directly from the mach-omap2/pm24xx.c code.  This removes some
>> unnecessary SRAM code.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
>> Cc: Richard Woodruff <r-woodruff2@ti.com>
>> Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
>
> Here's an updated version of this one.
>
>
> - Paul
>
> From: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
> Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2012 10:15:48 -0700
> Subject: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2xxx: PM: enter WFI via inline asm if CORE stays
>  active
>
> There shouldn't be any need to jump to SRAM code if the OMAP CORE
> clockdomain (and consequently the SDRAM controller and CORE PLL) stays
> active during MPU WFI.  The SRAM code should only be needed when the RAM
> enters self-refresh.  So in the case where CORE stays active, just call
> WFI directly from the mach-omap2/pm24xx.c code.  This removes some
> unnecessary SRAM code.
>
> This second version replaces the inline WFI with the corresponding
> coprocessor register call, using tlbflush.h as an example.  This is
> because the assembler doesn't recognize WFI as a valid ARMv6
> instruction.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
> Cc: Richard Woodruff <r-woodruff2@ti.com>
> Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>

Acked-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>

> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm24xx.c    |   12 ++++++------
>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/sleep24xx.S |   19 -------------------
>  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm24xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm24xx.c
> index c333fa6..8914b9e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm24xx.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm24xx.c
> @@ -54,7 +54,6 @@
>  #include "powerdomain.h"
>  #include "clockdomain.h"
>  
> -static void (*omap2_sram_idle)(void);
>  static void (*omap2_sram_suspend)(u32 dllctrl, void __iomem *sdrc_dlla_ctrl,
>  				  void __iomem *sdrc_power);
>  
> @@ -172,6 +171,8 @@ static int omap2_allow_mpu_retention(void)
>  
>  static void omap2_enter_mpu_retention(void)
>  {
> +	const int zero = 0;
> +
>  	/* Putting MPU into the WFI state while a transfer is active
>  	 * seems to cause the I2C block to timeout. Why? Good question. */
>  	if (omap2_i2c_active())
> @@ -196,7 +197,8 @@ static void omap2_enter_mpu_retention(void)
>  						 OMAP2_PM_PWSTCTRL);
>  	}
>  
> -	omap2_sram_idle();
> +	/* WFI */
> +	asm("mcr p15, 0, %0, c7, c0, 4" : : "r" (zero) : "memory", "cc");
>  }
>  
>  static int omap2_can_sleep(void)
> @@ -356,11 +358,9 @@ int __init omap2_pm_init(void)
>  	/*
>  	 * We copy the assembler sleep/wakeup routines to SRAM.
>  	 * These routines need to be in SRAM as that's the only
> -	 * memory the MPU can see when it wakes up.
> +	 * memory the MPU can see when it wakes up after the entire
> +	 * chip enters idle.
>  	 */
> -	omap2_sram_idle = omap_sram_push(omap24xx_idle_loop_suspend,
> -					 omap24xx_idle_loop_suspend_sz);
> -
>  	omap2_sram_suspend = omap_sram_push(omap24xx_cpu_suspend,
>  					    omap24xx_cpu_suspend_sz);
>  
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sleep24xx.S b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sleep24xx.S
> index ce0ccd2..1d3cb25 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sleep24xx.S
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sleep24xx.S
> @@ -37,25 +37,6 @@
>  	.text
>  
>  /*
> - * Forces OMAP into idle state
> - *
> - * omap24xx_idle_loop_suspend() - This bit of code just executes the WFI
> - * for normal idles.
> - *
> - * Note: This code get's copied to internal SRAM at boot. When the OMAP
> - *	 wakes up it continues execution at the point it went to sleep.
> - */
> -	.align	3
> -ENTRY(omap24xx_idle_loop_suspend)
> -	stmfd	sp!, {r0, lr}		@ save registers on stack
> -	mov	r0, #0			@ clear for mcr setup
> -	mcr	p15, 0, r0, c7, c0, 4	@ wait for interrupt
> -	ldmfd	sp!, {r0, pc}		@ restore regs and return
> -
> -ENTRY(omap24xx_idle_loop_suspend_sz)
> -	.word	. - omap24xx_idle_loop_suspend
> -
> -/*
>   * omap24xx_cpu_suspend() - Forces OMAP into deep sleep state by completing
>   * SDRC shutdown then ARM shutdown.  Upon wake MPU is back on so just restore
>   * SDRC.

  reply	other threads:[~2013-02-12 15:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-12-30 18:28 [PATCH 0/3] ARM: OMAP2+: PM/hwmod: clean up some WFI-related code Paul Walmsley
2012-12-30 18:28 ` [PATCH 1/3] ARM: OMAP2xxx: PM: enter WFI via inline asm if CORE stays active Paul Walmsley
2012-12-31  8:27   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-06 21:21   ` Paul Walmsley
2013-02-12 15:28     ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2012-12-30 18:28 ` [PATCH 2/3] ARM: OMAP2+: hwmod: add support for blocking WFI when a device is active Paul Walmsley
2012-12-31  8:25   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2012-12-31 12:56     ` Paul Walmsley
2012-12-31 13:10       ` Santosh Shilimkar
2012-12-30 18:28 ` [PATCH 3/3] ARM: OMAP2420: hwmod data/PM: use hwmod to block WFI when I2C active Paul Walmsley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87wqudv9ee.fsf@linaro.org \
    --to=khilman@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@pwsan.com \
    --cc=r-woodruff2@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).