From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Cc: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Sourav Poddar <sourav.poddar@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2: UART: fix console UART mismatched runtime PM status
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 18:03:39 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wqyplxjo.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121016211828.GL15569@atomide.com> (Tony Lindgren's message of "Tue, 16 Oct 2012 14:18:29 -0700")
Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> writes:
> * Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com> [121016 03:32]:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 04:49:58PM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>> > From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
>> >
>> > The runtime PM framework assumes that the hardware state of devices
>> > when initialized is disabled. For all omap_devices, we idle/disable
>> > device by default. However, the console uart uses a "no idle" option
>> > during omap_device init in order to allow earlyprintk usage to work
>> > seamlessly during boot.
>> >
>> > Because the hardware is left partially enabled after init (whatever
>> > the bootloader settings were), the omap_device should later be fully
>> > initialized (including mux) and the runtime PM framework should be
>> > told that the device is active, and not disabled so that the hardware
>> > state is in sync with runtime PM state.
>> >
>> > To fix, after the device has been created/registered, call
>> > omap_device_enable() to finialize init and use pm_runtime_set_active()
>> > to tell the runtime PM core the device is enabled.
>> >
>> > Tested on 2420/n810, 3530/Overo, 3530/Beagle, 3730/OveroSTORM,
>> > 3730/Beagle-xM, 4460/PandaES.
>> >
>> > Reported-by: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
>> > Suggested-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
>> > Cc: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
>> > Cc: Sourav Poddar <sourav.poddar@ti.com>
>> > Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
>> > ---
>> > Applies against v3.7-rc1.
>> > Fix targetted for v3.7.
>> >
>> > I'm still not entirely sure why this has worked up to now on OMAP3/4
>> > but not on OMAP2. Even so, this fix is needed for all platforms to
>> > ensure matching hardware state and runtime PM state.
>> >
>> > arch/arm/mach-omap2/serial.c | 5 +++++
>> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/serial.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/serial.c
>> > index 0405c81..37b5dbe 100644
>> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/serial.c
>> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/serial.c
>> > @@ -327,6 +327,11 @@ void __init omap_serial_init_port(struct omap_board_data *bdata,
>> > if ((console_uart_id == bdata->id) && no_console_suspend)
>> > omap_device_disable_idle_on_suspend(pdev);
>> >
>> > + if (console_uart_id == bdata->id) {
>> > + omap_device_enable(pdev);
>> > + pm_runtime_set_active(&pdev->dev);
>> > + }
>> > +
>> > oh->mux = omap_hwmod_mux_init(bdata->pads, bdata->pads_cnt);
>> >
>> > oh->dev_attr = uart;
>>
>> looks good to me. Even took care of doing that only for the console
>> UART.
>
> Applying into omap-for-v3.7-rc1/fixes-take3.
>
Doh, this isn't quite right yet. Some more PM testing shows that UART
wakeups are broken, so this isn't ready for v3.7 yet.
To be continued...
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-17 1:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-15 23:49 [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2: UART: fix console UART mismatched runtime PM status Kevin Hilman
2012-10-16 0:01 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-10-16 10:25 ` Felipe Balbi
2012-10-16 21:18 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-10-17 1:03 ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2012-10-17 2:14 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-10-17 8:28 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87wqyplxjo.fsf@deeprootsystems.com \
--to=khilman@deeprootsystems.com \
--cc=balbi@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@pwsan.com \
--cc=rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=sourav.poddar@ti.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox