From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
To: Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com>
Cc: paul@pwsan.com, rnayak@ti.com, santosh.shilimkar@ti.com,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, toddpoynor@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 8/8] OMAP2+: hwmod: Follow the recommended PRCM module enable sequence
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 10:16:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wrg5yiz5.fsf@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1309191103-8817-9-git-send-email-b-cousson@ti.com> (Benoit Cousson's message of "Mon, 27 Jun 2011 18:11:43 +0200")
Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com> writes:
> From: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>
>
> On OMAP4, the PRCM recommended sequence for enabling
> a module after power-on-reset is:
> -1- Force clkdm to SW_WKUP
> -2- Enabling the clocks
> -3- Configure desired module mode to "enable" or "auto"
> -4- Wait for the desired module idle status to be FUNC
> -5- Program clkdm in HW_AUTO(if supported)
>
> This sequence applies to all older OMAPs' as well,
> however since they use autodeps, it makes sure that
> no clkdm is in IDLE, and hence not requiring a force
> SW_WKUP when a module is being enabled.
OK, I found the problem that prevents booting on OMAP3...
> OMAP4 does not need to support autodeps, because
> of the dyanamic dependency feature, wherein
> the HW takes care of waking up a clockdomain from
> idle and hence the module, whenever an interconnect
> access happens to the given module.
>
> Implementing the sequence for OMAP4 requires
> the clockdomain handling that is currently done in
> clock framework to be done as part of hwmod framework
> since the step -4- above to "Wait for the desired
> module idle status to be FUNC" is done as part of
> hwmod framework.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>
> [b-cousson@ti.com: Adapt it to the new clkdm hwmod attribute and API]
> Signed-off-by: Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com>
> Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock.c | 17 +----------------
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock.c
> index 180299e..2828d29 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock.c
> @@ -268,9 +268,6 @@ void omap2_clk_disable(struct clk *clk)
> clk->ops->disable(clk);
> }
>
> - if (clk->clkdm)
> - clkdm_clk_disable(clk->clkdm, clk);
> -
> if (clk->parent)
> omap2_clk_disable(clk->parent);
> }
> @@ -308,30 +305,18 @@ int omap2_clk_enable(struct clk *clk)
> }
> }
>
> - if (clk->clkdm) {
> - ret = clkdm_clk_enable(clk->clkdm, clk);
> - if (ret) {
> - WARN(1, "clock: %s: could not enable clockdomain %s: "
> - "%d\n", clk->name, clk->clkdm->name, ret);
> - goto oce_err2;
> - }
> - }
> -
> if (clk->ops && clk->ops->enable) {
> trace_clock_enable(clk->name, 1, smp_processor_id());
> ret = clk->ops->enable(clk);
> if (ret) {
> WARN(1, "clock: %s: could not enable: %d\n",
> clk->name, ret);
> - goto oce_err3;
> + goto oce_err2;
> }
> }
The clkdm enable/disable in this part of the patch is still required on
OMAP2/3, since the clkdm is still attached to the clock and not to the
hwmod.
Just backing out the mach-omap2/clock.c changes from this patch allows
this series to boot fine on OMAP3.
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-28 17:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-27 16:11 [PATCH v3 0/8] Fix module-mode enable sequence on OMAP4 Benoit Cousson
2011-06-27 16:11 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] OMAP2+: clockdomain: Add an api to read idle mode Benoit Cousson
2011-07-01 12:22 ` Paul Walmsley
2011-06-27 16:11 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] OMAP2+: clockdomain: Add SoC support for clkdm_is_idle Benoit Cousson
2011-06-27 19:18 ` Todd Poynor
2011-07-01 12:24 ` Paul Walmsley
2011-06-27 16:11 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] OMAP2+: PM: Initialise sleep_switch to a non-valid value Benoit Cousson
2011-06-27 16:11 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] OMAP2+: PM: idle clkdms only if already in idle Benoit Cousson
2011-06-28 1:00 ` Todd Poynor
2011-06-27 16:11 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] OMAP4: PM: TEMP: Prevent l3init from idling/force sleep Benoit Cousson
2011-06-27 16:11 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] OMAP2+: clockdomain: Add 2 APIs to control clockdomain from hwmod framework Benoit Cousson
2011-06-28 1:08 ` Todd Poynor
2011-06-27 16:11 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] OMAP2+: clockdomain: Add per clkdm lock to prevent concurrent state programming Benoit Cousson
2011-06-27 16:11 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] OMAP2+: hwmod: Follow the recommended PRCM module enable sequence Benoit Cousson
2011-06-28 0:11 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-06-28 13:05 ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-06-28 22:03 ` Rajendra Nayak
2011-06-28 22:23 ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-06-28 17:16 ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2011-06-28 21:33 ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-06-28 21:55 ` Rajendra Nayak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87wrg5yiz5.fsf@ti.com \
--to=khilman@ti.com \
--cc=b-cousson@ti.com \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@pwsan.com \
--cc=rnayak@ti.com \
--cc=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
--cc=toddpoynor@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox