From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kevin Hilman Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] gpio/omap: remaining cleanups and fix Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 15:13:36 -0700 Message-ID: <87y5ozu1kf.fsf@ti.com> References: <1335536018-16004-1-git-send-email-tarun.kanti@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from na3sys009aog104.obsmtp.com ([74.125.149.73]:52204 "EHLO na3sys009aog104.obsmtp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757052Ab2EJWNk (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 May 2012 18:13:40 -0400 Received: by pbbrp8 with SMTP id rp8so2454086pbb.19 for ; Thu, 10 May 2012 15:13:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Govindraj Raja's message of "Thu, 10 May 2012 12:08:10 +0530") Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: "Raja, Govindraj" Cc: Tarun Kanti DebBarma , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Tony Lindgren , Santosh Shilimkar , "Cousson, Benoit" , Grant Likely Hi Govindraj, "Raja, Govindraj" writes: [...] > I tested this series from your tree on Beagle-XM retention, offmode, > suspend to mem and resume with and and without enabling offmode > from sysfs was checked and found retention count and off mode > count was getting incremented. > > Also ran few test cases available from here[1] to request and release gpio, > test cases passed. > > Feel Free to add: > > Tested-by: Govindraj.R Awesome! Many thanks for the testing. It *greatly* helps when maintainers can see more testing by folks other than the author. Thank you! Kevin