Re: [PATCH] OMAP3+: sr_device: include pm header

[Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>]

Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> writes:

> omap_enable_smartreflex_on_init is meant to be used by boards
> which would like to have SR enabled by default on the platform, while
> omap_devinit_smartreflex is used by pm code, the protos are defined
> in pm.h. This header should be included to ensure that sr_device
> function definitions match the prototypes.
>
> including pm.h fixes the sparse warnings (with CONFIG_OMAP_SMARTREFLEX=y):
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/sr_device.c:138:13: warning: symbol 'omap_enable_smartreflex_on_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/sr_device.c:143:12: warning: symbol 'omap_devinit_smartreflex' was not declared. Should it be static?
>
> Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>

Thanks, will queue as a fix for 2.6.38-rc cycle.

Kevin

> Based on:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tmlind/linux-omap-2.6.git
> branch: omap-for-linus
>
>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/sr_device.c |    1 +
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sr_device.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sr_device.c
> index 786d685..b1e0af1 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sr_device.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sr_device.c
> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
>  #include <plat/voltage.h>
>  
>  #include "control.h"
> +#include "pm.h"
>  
>  static bool sr_enable_on_init;