From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kevin Hilman Subject: Re: n800 high idle power consumption Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 06:45:08 -0700 Message-ID: <87zle6xj17.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> References: <877i1aejon.fsf@litku.valot.fi> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com ([209.85.198.237]:50171 "EHLO rv-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752596AbZDXNpL (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Apr 2009 09:45:11 -0400 Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id f9so1011325rvb.1 for ; Fri, 24 Apr 2009 06:45:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <877i1aejon.fsf@litku.valot.fi> (Kalle Valo's message of "Fri\, 24 Apr 2009 07\:53\:44 +0300") Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Kalle Valo Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Kalle Valo writes: > Hello all, > > I was testing 2.6.30-rc3-omap1 on n800 and noticed that idle power > consumption is very high, ten times compared to a 2.6.29 I tested few > weeks back. I'm guessing that CPU doesn't sleep at all. > > Is this a regression? How should I debug this further? Between .29 and .30, the PM code in l-o was dropped and re-sync'd to kernel.org code. This is so that PM can be separated out into a separate branch and submitted upstream independently. The current PM branch is in the process of being re-based onto 2.6.30. When it's ready, I'd appreciate any testing on n800. Kevin