public inbox for linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
To: Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
	Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>,
	Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
	Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
	linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v1 16/23] hwspinlock: omap: Discard pm_runtime_put() return value
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2025 21:24:19 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <883243465.0ifERbkFSE@rafael.j.wysocki> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6245770.lOV4Wx5bFT@rafael.j.wysocki>

From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Failing driver probe due to pm_runtime_put() returning a negative value
is not particularly useful.

Returning an error code from pm_runtime_put() merely means that it has
not queued up a work item to check whether or not the device can be
suspended and there are many perfectly valid situations in which that
can happen, like after writing "on" to the devices' runtime PM "control"
attribute in sysfs for one example.  It also happens when the kernel
has been configured with CONFIG_PM unset.

Accordingly, update omap_hwspinlock_probe() to simply discard the
return value of pm_runtime_put().

This will facilitate a planned change of the pm_runtime_put() return
type to void in the future.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---

This patch is part of a series, but it doesn't depend on anything else
in that series.  The last patch in the series depends on it.

It can be applied by itself and if you decide to do so, please let me
know.

Otherwise, an ACK or equivalent will be appreciated, but also the lack
of specific criticism will be eventually regarded as consent.

---
 drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c |    4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c
+++ b/drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c
@@ -101,9 +101,7 @@ static int omap_hwspinlock_probe(struct
 	 * runtime PM will make sure the clock of this module is
 	 * enabled again iff at least one lock is requested
 	 */
-	ret = pm_runtime_put(&pdev->dev);
-	if (ret < 0)
-		return ret;
+	pm_runtime_put(&pdev->dev);
 
 	/* one of the four lsb's must be set, and nothing else */
 	if (hweight_long(i & 0xf) != 1 || i > 8)




       reply	other threads:[~2025-12-22 20:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <6245770.lOV4Wx5bFT@rafael.j.wysocki>
2025-12-22 20:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2025-12-22 20:46   ` [PATCH v1 16/23] hwspinlock: omap: Discard pm_runtime_put() return value Bjorn Andersson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=883243465.0ifERbkFSE@rafael.j.wysocki \
    --to=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=andersson@kernel.org \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=briannorris@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox