From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Anand Gadiyar Subject: RE: linux-next - multi-omap image fails to boot on omap3/4 Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 10:08:15 -0400 Message-ID: <8fb818d83ad3cb8e8e979e9b4ac52736@mail.gmail.com> References: <4CBDAFFF.2030409@ti.com> <20101019182149.GC3038@atomide.com> <20101019225726.GE3038@atomide.com> <20101019233204.GA30991@atomide.com> <20101021161545.GC3616@atomide.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Return-path: Received: from na3sys009aog103.obsmtp.com ([74.125.149.71]:34110 "EHLO na3sys009aog103.obsmtp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756963Ab0JVOIT (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Oct 2010 10:08:19 -0400 Received: by wwe15 with SMTP id 15so879014wwe.13 for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 07:08:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20101021161545.GC3616@atomide.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Tony Lindgren Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Gadiyar, Anand [101019 23:21]: ... > > >>> > >> linux-next, as of 20101019, built with the omap2plus_defconfig fails > > >>> > >> to boot on omap3 and omap4. (I've disabled CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP2 or > > >>> > >> CONFIG_SWP_EMULATE to get the image to build). Building with only > > >>> > >> ARCH_OMAP3 allows the resultant image to boot up on OMAP3. Likewise, > > >>> > >> an image built with only ARCH_OMAP4 boots up on OMAP4 boards. > > >>> > >> > > >>> > >> earlyprintk does not provide any additional prints after > > >>> > >> "Uncompressing Linux... done, booting the kernel." > > >>> > >> > > >>> > >> Any ideas where to look? > > >>> > > ... > > > > I tried disabling CONFIG_SMP and CONFIG_SMP_ON_UP, and the resulting > > image booted up just fine. > > Looks like it's caused by this patch: > > "ARM: hotplug cpu: Keep processor information, startup code & > __lookup_processor_type" > > It's probably trashing registers it shouldn't. Will take a look and post > something to linux-arm-kernel. > I'm not sure what's going on, but looks like linux-next as of 20101022 boots up fine on panda. I can't explain it, as I couldn't find anything related to the patch you mentioned. - Anand