From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] ARM: smp: Select local timers vs dummy timer support runtime Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 20:13:07 -0800 Message-ID: <8ya1v3aey0c.fsf@huya.qualcomm.com> References: <1297510187-31547-1-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> <1297510187-31547-2-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Return-path: Received: from wolverine02.qualcomm.com ([199.106.114.251]:22371 "EHLO wolverine02.qualcomm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751398Ab1BOENI (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Feb 2011 23:13:08 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1297510187-31547-2-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> (Santosh Shilimkar's message of "Sat, 12 Feb 2011 16:59:43 +0530") Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Santosh Shilimkar Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, khilman@ti.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, tony@atomide.com, Russell King , Daniel Walker , Bryan Huntsman , Kukjin Kim , Paul Mundt , Magnus Damm , Colin Cross , Erik Gilling , Srinidhi Kasagar , Linus Walleij On Sat, Feb 12 2011, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: > The current code support of dummy timers in absence of local > timer is compile time. This is an attempt to convert it to runtime > so that on few SOC version if the local timers aren't supported > kernel can switch to dummy timers. OMAP4430 ES1.0 does suffer from > this limitation. > > This patch should not have any functional impact on affected > files. > > Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar > --- > arch/arm/mach-msm/timer.c | 3 ++- Acked-By: David Brown -- Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.