From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] drivers/iommu/ relocations Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2011 15:23:10 -0700 Message-ID: <8yar574klo1.fsf@huya.qualcomm.com> References: <1307522062-19273-1-git-send-email-ohad@wizery.com> <20110608093546.GG4407@amd.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20110608093546.GG4407@amd.com> (Joerg Roedel's message of "Wed, 8 Jun 2011 11:35:46 +0200") Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org To: "Roedel, Joerg" Cc: Ohad Ben-Cohen , "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Arnd Bergmann , David Woodhouse , "iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org" , "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" , Ingo Molnar List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 08 2011, Roedel, Joerg wrote: > Great, thanks. I'll apply the patches as soon as the relevant ACKs come > in. Looking at the MAINTAINERS file David Brown needs to ACK the MSM > patch and David Woodhouse the VT-d patch. > > David B., David W., is this direction ok for both of you? I think it is a good direction to move in. I'll reply to the patch directly to comment on it. > My suggestion is that the ARM tree pulls in the necessary changes from > the IOMMU tree and the IOMMU code goes upstream through Ingo or directly > to Linus (with some time in linux-next, of course). Thoughts? This seems the cleanest to me. David -- Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.