From: Roger Quadros <rogerq@kernel.org>
To: Shree Ramamoorthy <s-ramamoorthy@ti.com>,
lgirdwood@gmail.com, broonie@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org,
krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, aaro.koskinen@iki.fi,
andreas@kemnade.info, khilman@baylibre.com, tony@atomide.com,
jerome.neanne@baylibre.com, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Cc: m-leonard@ti.com, praneeth@ti.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/7] regulator: dt-bindings: Add TI TPS65215 PMIC bindings
Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2025 20:28:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <918d3b67-9bb3-4da2-a779-69ae9e9c4f6b@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241226215412.395822-2-s-ramamoorthy@ti.com>
On 26/12/2024 23:54, Shree Ramamoorthy wrote:
> TPS65215 is a Power Management IC with 3 Buck regulators and 2 LDOs.
>
> TPS65215 has 2 LDOS and 1 GPO, whereas TPS65219 has 4 LDOs and 2 GPOs. The
> remaining features for both devices are the same.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shree Ramamoorthy <s-ramamoorthy@ti.com>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/regulator/ti,tps65219.yaml | 9 ++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/ti,tps65219.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/ti,tps65219.yaml
> index 78e64521d401..ba5f6fcf5219 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/ti,tps65219.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/ti,tps65219.yaml
> @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
> $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/regulator/ti,tps65219.yaml#
> $schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
>
> -title: TI tps65219 Power Management Integrated Circuit regulators
> +title: TI TPS65215/TPS65219 Power Management Integrated Circuit
>
> maintainers:
> - Jerome Neanne <jerome.neanne@baylibre.com>
> @@ -12,10 +12,17 @@ maintainers:
> description: |
> Regulator nodes should be named to buck<number> and ldo<number>.
>
> + TI TPS65219 is a Power Management IC with 3 Buck regulators, 4 Low
> + Drop-out Regulators (LDOs), 1 GPIO, 2 GPOs, and power-button.
> +
> + TI TPS65215 is a derivative of TPS65219 with 3 Buck regulators, 2 Low
> + Drop-out Regulators (LDOs), 1 GPIO, 1 GPO, and power-button.
> +
> properties:
> compatible:
> enum:
> - ti,tps65219
> + - ti,tps65215
Could be sorted alphanumerically.
>
> reg:
> maxItems: 1
--
cheers,
-roger
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-04 18:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-26 21:54 [PATCH v1 0/7] Add TI TPS65215 PMIC Regulator Support Shree Ramamoorthy
2024-12-26 21:54 ` [PATCH v1 1/7] regulator: dt-bindings: Add TI TPS65215 PMIC bindings Shree Ramamoorthy
2024-12-27 17:45 ` Conor Dooley
2025-01-04 18:28 ` Roger Quadros [this message]
2024-12-26 21:54 ` [PATCH v1 2/7] regulator: tps65215: Update platform_device_id table Shree Ramamoorthy
2025-01-01 10:49 ` Christophe JAILLET
2024-12-26 21:54 ` [PATCH v1 3/7] regulator: tps65215: Update function & struct names Shree Ramamoorthy
2025-01-04 18:35 ` Roger Quadros
2024-12-26 21:54 ` [PATCH v1 4/7] regulator: tps65215: Update IRQ structs to include TPS65215 Shree Ramamoorthy
2024-12-26 21:54 ` [PATCH v1 5/7] regulator: tps65215: Add chip_data struct for multi-PMIC support Shree Ramamoorthy
2024-12-26 21:54 ` [PATCH v1 6/7] regulator: tps65215: Define probe() helper functions Shree Ramamoorthy
2025-01-01 11:01 ` Christophe JAILLET
2025-01-02 23:41 ` Shree Ramamoorthy
2025-01-03 13:10 ` Christophe JAILLET
2025-01-04 18:42 ` Roger Quadros
2025-01-04 18:45 ` Roger Quadros
2025-01-06 22:02 ` Shree Ramamoorthy
2025-01-06 22:57 ` Andrew Davis
2025-01-07 21:09 ` Shree Ramamoorthy
2024-12-26 21:54 ` [PATCH v1 7/7] regulator: tps65215: Restructure probe() for multi-PMIC support Shree Ramamoorthy
2025-01-01 11:04 ` Christophe JAILLET
2025-01-02 23:46 ` Shree Ramamoorthy
2025-01-04 18:47 ` Roger Quadros
2025-01-07 21:12 ` Shree Ramamoorthy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=918d3b67-9bb3-4da2-a779-69ae9e9c4f6b@kernel.org \
--to=rogerq@kernel.org \
--cc=aaro.koskinen@iki.fi \
--cc=andreas@kemnade.info \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jerome.neanne@baylibre.com \
--cc=khilman@baylibre.com \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m-leonard@ti.com \
--cc=praneeth@ti.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=s-ramamoorthy@ti.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox