From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexander Sverdlin Subject: Re: [PATCH] arch: arm: Kconfig: pedantic formatting Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 22:28:43 +0100 Message-ID: <9f6201c2-b62f-ac5d-a24b-a51da1b5e900@gmail.com> References: <1552312598-25574-1-git-send-email-info@metux.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1552312598-25574-1-git-send-email-info@metux.net> Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: "Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: andrew@aj.id.au, hsweeten@visionengravers.com, kaloz@openwrt.org, khalasa@piap.pl, lkundrak@v3.sk, aaro.koskinen@iki.fi, tony@atomide.com, baohua@kernel.org, kgene@kernel.org, krzk@kernel.org, linux@prisktech.co.nz, mcuos.com@gmail.com, matthias.bgg@gmail.com, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Hi! On 11/03/2019 14:56, Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult wrote: > Formatting of Kconfig files doesn't look so pretty, so let the > Great White Handkerchief come around and clean it up. > > Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult > --- > arch/arm/Kconfig | 24 +++++++++++----------- > arch/arm/mach-aspeed/Kconfig | 10 ++++----- > arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/Kconfig | 8 ++++---- > arch/arm/mach-hisi/Kconfig | 14 ++++++------- > arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/Kconfig | 32 ++++++++++++++--------------- > arch/arm/mach-mmp/Kconfig | 2 +- > arch/arm/mach-omap1/Kconfig | 36 ++++++++++++++++---------------- > arch/arm/mach-omap2/Kconfig | 12 +++++------ > arch/arm/mach-prima2/Kconfig | 6 +++--- > arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/Kconfig | 32 ++++++++++++++--------------- > arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/Kconfig | 16 +++++++-------- > arch/arm/mach-sa1100/Kconfig | 4 ++-- > arch/arm/mach-vt8500/Kconfig | 6 +++--- > arch/arm/mach-w90x900/Kconfig | 6 +++--- > arch/arm/mm/Kconfig | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------------- > arch/arm/plat-samsung/Kconfig | 26 +++++++++++------------ > 16 files changed, 140 insertions(+), 142 deletions(-) > [...] > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/Kconfig > index c095236..597ea24 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/Kconfig > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/Kconfig > @@ -125,10 +125,10 @@ config MACH_MICRO9S > Contec Micro9-Slim board. > > config MACH_SIM_ONE > - bool "Support Simplemachines Sim.One board" > - help > - Say 'Y' here if you want your kernel to support the > - Simplemachines Sim.One board. > + bool "Support Simplemachines Sim.One board" > + help > + Say 'Y' here if you want your kernel to support the > + Simplemachines Sim.One board. > > config MACH_SNAPPER_CL15 > bool "Support Bluewater Systems Snapper CL15 Module" For EP93xx part: Acked-by: Alexander Sverdlin It makes no sense to split the patch, one of the ARM maintainers shall decide on this patch anyway. In my personal opinion such a patch makes little sense if it's not tree-wide. -- Regards, Alexander.