From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Airlie Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] omap changes for v2.6.39 merge window Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 13:29:38 +1000 Message-ID: References: <20110317183048.GW7258@atomide.com> <20110318101512.GA15375@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <201103301906.42429.arnd@arndb.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Nicolas Pitre Cc: david@lang.hm, Linus Torvalds , Arnd Bergmann , Russell King - ARM Linux , Tony Lindgren , David Brown , lkml , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Catalin Marinas List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org > As long as SOC vendors keep producing wildly different architectures > besides the core CPU we'll have this problem. =A0Denying the reality = won't > make that problem go away either. =A0And device tree won't stop those > vendor from still trying to do things differently (better?) because t= hey > are not constrained by having to ensure this single proprietary softw= are > stack still boot. So you are saying the only way to get the Linux ARM shit cleaned up is to hope Microsoft succeeds in making Windows a success on ARM? Dave.