From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Felipe Contreras Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8) Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2010 22:56:45 +0300 Message-ID: References: <20100527222514.0a1710bf@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <1275149418.4503.128.camel@mulgrave.site> <1275156734.1645.496.camel@laptop> <201005312314.12391.rjw@sisk.pl> <20100605214939.49dd0ee0@schatten.dmk.lab> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: Received: from mail-fx0-f46.google.com ([209.85.161.46]:41784 "EHLO mail-fx0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932100Ab0FET4r (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Jun 2010 15:56:47 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20100605214939.49dd0ee0@schatten.dmk.lab> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Florian Mickler Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Peter Zijlstra , James Bottomley , =?UTF-8?B?QXJ2ZSBIasO4bm5ldsOlZw==?= , tytso@mit.edu, LKML , Linux PM , Thomas Gleixner , Linux OMAP Mailing List , felipe.balbi@nokia.com, Alan Cox On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 10:49 PM, Florian Mickler wrote: > On Sat, 5 Jun 2010 20:16:33 +0300 > Felipe Contreras wrote: >> New users will see it has low score; they will not install it. That's >> a network effect. >> >> Having users is the quintessential reason people write code. > > That is nice. But how does it impact the problem that suspend blockers > solve? And why do suspend blockers interfere with that? It doesn't, I don't know why people keep bringing this argument, I just though it should not be left open as a valid one. I should have mentioned that this is indeed irrelevant. -- Felipe Contreras