From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vitaly Wool Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8) Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 14:01:49 +0200 Message-ID: References: <1274482015-30899-1-git-send-email-arve@android.com> <201005242049.18920.rjw@sisk.pl> <87wrusvrqe.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> <201005250138.16293.rjw@sisk.pl> <1274863655.5882.4875.camel@twins> <1274867106.5882.5090.camel@twins> <20100526120242.5c9b73ad@schatten.dmk.lab> <20100526133721.602633b2@schatten.dmk.lab> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Return-path: Received: from mail-gw0-f46.google.com ([74.125.83.46]:36895 "EHLO mail-gw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753474Ab0EZMBu (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 May 2010 08:01:50 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20100526133721.602633b2@schatten.dmk.lab> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Florian Mickler Cc: Peter Zijlstra , LKML , Paul@smtp1.linux-foundation.org, felipe.balbi@nokia.com, Linux OMAP Mailing List , Linux PM On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 1:37 PM, Florian Mickler wrote: > This is not "protection". This is functioning properly in a real world > scenario. Why would the user change the kernel, if the device would be > buggy after that? (Except maybe he is a geek) Hmm... Why would the user continue to use the program if it slows down his device and sucks the battery as a vampire (Except maybe he's a moron)? ;) ~Vitaly