From: "Gulati, Shweta" <shweta.gulati@ti.com>
To: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] OMAP4: Add IVA OPP enteries with Updated Voltage Rail Values.
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 17:50:18 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTimV1gNtng_4K-QonddimmREpHFnjVnDPN6YkSxt@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D6FA891.6080403@ti.com>
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 8:11 PM, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> wrote:
> Gulati, Shweta wrote, on 03/03/2011 07:37 PM:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 3:53 PM, Menon, Nishanth<nm@ti.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 15:39, Gulati, Shweta<shweta.gulati@ti.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Menon, Nishanth<nm@ti.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 14:57, Shweta Gulati<shweta.gulati@ti.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This Patch adds OPP enteries for IVA in OMAP4 OPP Table
>>>>>> and updates IVA voltage Rail values obtained from latest
>>>>>> OMAP4430 Data Manual Operating Condition Addendum.
>>>>>
>>>>> Do you think we should add the version of the document in the commit
>>>>> message - it looks like every "latest" version we look at has some
>>>>> update, so we'd know what baseline the code currently maps to when we
>>>>> do a git blame at a later point of time
>>>>
>>>> Ok, Will do.
>>>
>>> Sorry, one more tiny point I missed - for the sake of ensuring the
>>> functional bisectability - could you do the following:
>>> a) update voltages (MPU,IVA) for doc 0.3
>>> b) introduce IVA OPPs
>>
>>> what do you think?
>>
>> I think its better to submit MPU and IVA domain Patches seperately
>> The way I have done:
>> 1. Patch Series that has MPU OPP Table and Voltage Rail Value changes.
>> 2. Patch which adds IVA OPP Entries and updates Voltage Rail values.
>
> Thank you, but I had already understood what had been done. I was wondering
> if there is a reason why not we do:
> a) voltage updates on the code we already have - this categorizes as a fix
> b) introduce OPP entries for IVA - this in a way categorizes as a "feature
> addition"
Ok, will do this way, rebasing all the patches to pm-core branch and
including all comments
received and putting features and fixes in different patches of a new
series.Thanks.
> --
> Regards,
> Nishanth Menon
>
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Shweta
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-04 12:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-03 9:27 [PATCH] OMAP4: Add IVA OPP enteries with Updated Voltage Rail Values Shweta Gulati
2011-03-03 9:34 ` Menon, Nishanth
2011-03-03 10:09 ` Gulati, Shweta
2011-03-03 10:23 ` Menon, Nishanth
2011-03-03 14:07 ` Gulati, Shweta
2011-03-03 14:41 ` Nishanth Menon
2011-03-04 12:20 ` Gulati, Shweta [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=AANLkTimV1gNtng_4K-QonddimmREpHFnjVnDPN6YkSxt@mail.gmail.com \
--to=shweta.gulati@ti.com \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).