From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kyungmin Park Subject: Re: [PATCH] OMAP: iommu flush page table entries from L1 and L2 cache Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 18:11:00 +0900 Message-ID: References: <1302817968-28516-1-git-send-email-fernando.lugo@ti.com> <201104181358.53521.arnd@arndb.de> <201104181613.43572.arnd@arndb.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <201104181613.43572.arnd@arndb.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Hari Kanigeri , Russell King - ARM Linux , Fernando Guzman Lugo , Tony Lindgren , Hiroshi DOYU , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrzej Pietrasiewicz , Ramesh Gupta , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Marek Szyprowski List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 11:13 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Monday 18 April 2011, Kyungmin Park wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 8:58 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote= : >> > >> > One missing piece is still a way for a platform to provide both >> > the iommu and the dma-mapping API in a unified driver. Right now, >> > you have to export both interface for a generic solution. >> >> Actually MSM and we (Michal, Marek) tried to merge the generic IOMMU >> implementation into mm, but MM did't accept it. > > I'm confused. What do you mean with MM? linux/mm, Memory Management. Thank you, Kyungmin Park > >> So now it's implemented at each SoCs. I think it's good chance to ma= ke >> a generic IOMMU feature for ARM consolidation. >> >> Before this idea, can you review our implementation at above URL? > > I've commented on the main implementation for the IOMMU now. > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Arnd > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel >