public inbox for linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Menon, Nishanth" <nm@ti.com>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>,
	Saquib <saquib.herman@gmail.com>,
	linux-omap <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: Duration of mdelay and udelay depends on MPU frequency in SMP
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:19:40 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTik9RVDtc0O2LkGTpbhT53a2CMcaTg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DF6D46B.90806@codeaurora.org>

On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 22:24, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> On 06/10/2011 03:19 PM, Menon, Nishanth wrote:
>> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 01:42, Santosh Shilimkar
>> <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> It's a well known problem if the udelay() is based of global lpj.
>>> You can read more here [1]
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Santosh
>>> [1] http://eeek.borgchat.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg120702.html
>> I am curious about this topic now.
>> Searching Russel's patchworks for this:
>> http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/search.php?summary=udelay
>> I see nothing queued. What is the recommendation for udelay?
>
> The patches are sitting in Russell's patch tracker, waiting for him to
> accept/reject them.
>
> http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/viewpatch.php?id=6874/1
> http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/viewpatch.php?id=6875/1
> http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/viewpatch.php?id=6873/1

thanks for the same and hope these do get through :)

Regards,
Nishanth Menon

      reply	other threads:[~2011-06-14  4:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <BANLkTikGXzLba8uqXoffaUixBrEGj-XzRQ@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found] ` <BANLkTimVPnzMCL=NMb7hDkL97nJ=XdFExw@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]   ` <4DCB8158.8060507@ti.com>
2011-06-10 22:19     ` Duration of mdelay and udelay depends on MPU frequency in SMP Menon, Nishanth
2011-06-14  3:24       ` Stephen Boyd
2011-06-14  4:19         ` Menon, Nishanth [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=BANLkTik9RVDtc0O2LkGTpbhT53a2CMcaTg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=nm@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
    --cc=saquib.herman@gmail.com \
    --cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox