From: "Pandita, Vikram" <vikram.pandita@ti.com>
To: Girish S G <girishsg@ti.com>
Cc: linux-omap <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] OMAP4: Regulator: Specify system has fully specified constraints
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:12:06 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTim6sY=2qQ7isxhKSWgjCWCrc5UX4g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1308702288-12787-1-git-send-email-girishsg@ti.com>
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 5:24 PM, Girish S G <girishsg@ti.com> wrote:
<snip>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-4430sdp.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-4430sdp.c
> index 04b7770..46f6800 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-4430sdp.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-4430sdp.c
> @@ -560,6 +560,9 @@ static struct i2c_board_info __initdata sdp4430_i2c_4_boardinfo[] = {
> };
> static int __init omap4_i2c_init(void)
> {
> + /* This will allow unused regulator to be shutdown */
> + regulator_has_full_constraints();
> +
Any particular reason to keep this call in i2c_init() function?
Does not look very intuitive to have generic regulator disable call in
an i2c init function !
> omap4_pmic_init("twl6030", &sdp4430_twldata);
> omap_register_i2c_bus(2, 400, NULL, 0);
> omap_register_i2c_bus(3, 400, sdp4430_i2c_3_boardinfo,
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap4panda.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap4panda.c
> index 3415a5e..c425f9f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap4panda.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap4panda.c
> @@ -412,6 +412,9 @@ static struct i2c_board_info __initdata panda_i2c_eeprom[] = {
>
> static int __init omap4_panda_i2c_init(void)
> {
> + /* This will allow unused regulator to be shutdown */
> + regulator_has_full_constraints();
> +
ditto
> omap4_pmic_init("twl6030", &omap4_panda_twldata);
> omap_register_i2c_bus(2, 400, NULL, 0);
> /*
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-22 22:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-22 0:24 [PATCH 2/2] OMAP4: Regulator: Specify system has fully specified constraints Girish S G
2011-06-22 22:12 ` Pandita, Vikram [this message]
2011-06-22 22:32 ` Ghongdemath, Girish
2011-06-27 23:11 ` Kevin Hilman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='BANLkTim6sY=2qQ7isxhKSWgjCWCrc5UX4g@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=vikram.pandita@ti.com \
--cc=girishsg@ti.com \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox