From: Vishal Thanki <vishalthanki@gmail.com>
To: Andreas Fenkart <afenkart@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mmc <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: omap_hsmmc: sdio: issue with generic wakeup IRQ handling
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 03:02:50 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAC3a_SDH3zspEAUHkGN0qCBKQZBdnhmei2Rqw2Md=7R2iXostA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160219141135.GA14354@c50.bag.software>
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 7:41 PM, Vishal Thanki <vishalthanki@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 10:31:04PM +0100, Andreas Fenkart wrote:
>> Hi Vishal,
>>
>> I remember there was a problem with IRQ, but can't remember on top of
>> my head. Meanwhile this might be some pointer:
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/sta_ioctl.c
>> b/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/sta_ioctl.c
>> index a6c8a4f..67587c2 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/sta_ioctl.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/sta_ioctl.c
>> @@ -517,6 +517,17 @@ int mwifiex_enable_hs(struct mwifiex_adapter *adapter)
>> adapter->hs_enabling = true;
>> mwifiex_cancel_all_pending_cmd(adapter);
>>
>> + /* if the MMC host is already in suspend it will not detect SDIO irq
>> + * and we might run into response timeout. By claiming the MMC host we
>> + * wake it up, which is sufficient to detect a pending IRQ
>> + */
>> + {
>> + struct sdio_mmc_card *card = adapter->card;
>> + sdio_claim_host(card->func);
>> + printk("+++ poll mmc host for IRQ +++\n");
>> + sdio_release_host(card->func);
>> + }
>> +
>> if (mwifiex_set_hs_params(mwifiex_get_priv(adapter,
>> MWIFIEX_BSS_ROLE_STA),
>> HostCmd_ACT_GEN_SET, MWIFIEX_SYNC_CMD,
>
> I tried this code change but that did not help. I saw that the code
> change is in a function called mwifiex_enable_hs(), which only gets
> invoked by mwifiex_sdio_suspend(); which is why I think it is not having
> any effect. Because when I run the command to scan the channel list
> (i.e. iw dev wlan0 scan), the system is not in suspend state. And I
> noticed (by adding prints in omap_hsmmc.c for suspend and resume
> callbacks) that during the "scan" command, the suspend routine gets invoked
> for HSMMC but it never gets resumed (may be due to the missed wakeup
> IRQ) from mwifiex and the command times out.
>
Is there any other suggestion for mwifiex that I should try out? Or
is there any way in omap_hsmmc to specify the wakeup interrupt
type (IRQF_TRIGGER_LOW) while using generic wakeup IRQ
mechanism. I could not find it, but I may be missing something.
Thanks,
Vishal
> Thanks for your help.
>
> Vishal
>
>
>>
>> 2016-02-18 19:27 GMT+01:00 Vishal Thanki <vishalthanki@gmail.com>:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On a custom built am335x based board, I am facing an issue mwifiex wifi
>> > module which is connected to host via SDIO interface. I am using kernel
>> > version 4.4.
>> >
>> > The problem is related to the wifi "ext_scan" command getting timed out
>> > over SDIO. This was working with old kernel (v4.0), but does not work on
>> > kernel v4.4. I found the following commit is responsible for this
>> > behavior.
>> >
>> > =================================
>> > 5b83b2234be6733cfe22036c38031b2c890b3db8
>> >
>> > mmc: omap_hsmmc: Change wake-up interrupt to use generic wakeirq
>> >
>> > We can now use generic wakeirq handling and remove the custom handling
>> > for the wake-up interrupts.
>> > =================================
>> >
>> > There is no wifi issue if I revert the above mentioned commit on kernel
>> > v4.4.
>> >
>> > I see that before this commit, the wakeup IRQ handler was registered
>> > within the omap_hsmmc.c itself with additional IRQF_TRIGGER_LOW flag.
>> > But with the introduction to dev_pm_set_dedicated_wake_irq(), the
>> > generic wakeup IRQ handler is registered which does not take the
>> > IRQF_TRIGGER flag. I am not sure if that is the issue, but I added that
>> > IRQF_TRIGGER_LOW flag in dev_pm_set_dedicated_wake_irq() while
>> > registering a threaded IRQ handler, I could see the problem disappears.
>> > However, this change is causing the infinite interrupts because the of
>> > level triggered interrupt is not handled in generic wakeup IRQ handling
>> > code (as it was done specially in omap_hsmmc.c code earlier).
>> >
>> > I am not much familiar with MMC/SDIO driver and I am not sure how to fix
>> > this behavior. So any guidance would be really helpful.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Vishal
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-24 21:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20160218182750.GA5948@c50.bag.software>
[not found] ` <CALtMJEBdXLef8AJ1-8Txmg2iS413bVV7cpQSb+nL5M7jN_QYzw@mail.gmail.com>
2016-02-19 14:11 ` omap_hsmmc: sdio: issue with generic wakeup IRQ handling Vishal Thanki
2016-02-24 21:32 ` Vishal Thanki [this message]
2016-02-25 10:46 ` Grygorii Strashko
2016-02-25 11:18 ` Vishal Thanki
2016-02-25 11:47 ` Grygorii Strashko
2016-02-25 12:18 ` Vishal Thanki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAC3a_SDH3zspEAUHkGN0qCBKQZBdnhmei2Rqw2Md=7R2iXostA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=vishalthanki@gmail.com \
--cc=afenkart@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).