From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1FDD1DFE8 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2024 00:19:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1731543576; cv=none; b=mYcxBABds/i/hy2GMoYJYygs7pbin9zkeZWq0aF0GlDYNjdijWFivlkayIXbTDAZ4AJ8OzObCxiPqPM0U3QzBIOzE8TkApYYKW1lH8mBzhTJl9Oe6L2UmX6ZjyL6aYhGcLE8JSNXUUDOjntIeU+pWyWrEJ8bq+qkrZ5xdMgkpGU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1731543576; c=relaxed/simple; bh=wcTsk2mVkM+r7LsGJm4puGmmXyvFM3Y8N0uW+fmzclQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=KKAkRhgMpxII3aWXiCi7kHdqm5dvzzKHHpGSwz0nR7b9EPK/Lu9gWFSUlqEPuXb+RIj8Ep2RmZCgr2gY1HlPIasoVl8J0PlNAUJyjUss3C6Ck/piCet9yL21rOtriIMk8mtHLcOcb1eUjaJB9nUbSG+zC/DQ2l0Wscc8QDWVoc0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=A+f641+B; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="A+f641+B" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1731543573; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=6vYNALOT6DNGlmEtNWgxZMEKRhF8lG4UkCDFtAuM+6U=; b=A+f641+BoItKFn/HRJYzYl2QCBlTHEmgNxYXZ1wHffMHzvW6nZPkLUbug4Ib//WGElf+HS amtUDDGykr/REgxn3IXqeBzt9oE5EcZEu9RVIbbZCDn4kloSmzSI2+MpsFbAcN0Doj/UQq BZQjkWwFGvUBdKYNIe9Ff/tVlkV6zN0= Received: from mail-wr1-f72.google.com (mail-wr1-f72.google.com [209.85.221.72]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-70-bFGaTUDCPgSzw47uH1Bnuw-1; Wed, 13 Nov 2024 19:19:30 -0500 X-MC-Unique: bFGaTUDCPgSzw47uH1Bnuw-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: bFGaTUDCPgSzw47uH1Bnuw Received: by mail-wr1-f72.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-37d45de8bbfso40736f8f.3 for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2024 16:19:30 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1731543569; x=1732148369; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=6vYNALOT6DNGlmEtNWgxZMEKRhF8lG4UkCDFtAuM+6U=; b=Gc96hPAVPds4WokEYGjtgNB6g2/tP42kVQXf8zqEoq9EU13934zJIbFyTKkHpo2FTc S9hZ9s6hH4bSNJN3ttVnwliKGVjiH9H7KVveF+RfQXAErTZ0yjsAyPDTJRogO5YJYH9j wNhHZdcTIgLc6PDmtnJ+uu2gJRklIZlROOh0dy6itE3PX2Ufht0xQpHrH9PnA6v114hO EmpQxGuxVrWs5GqBEOg+RyTXlcEuDT1ZzXNa4WAeZCAqtkwR1nBn33BrM9JkREaIxm5X AyLuzs8u4yYw8nI2Fyj6EbUmgBu9qyqqoy/3Y+G/LLhryaOyz8HjLucDLMc3vclOP1TF xyiw== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVXQBNuAhOkxxzF7k7hn3D42NLZ2M1z58y0kuWM3K7ZmxhUnaj79XazVVhwksqHPZc1hczjmzCCC5M8@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxNasfD60QYr+bZf4WqnbG9UjpNSpi7iyRtEa3rWvP6Ryovts2I vbrQlM3AjF/JOT7/Bfcf4Q/i/nCmnqOLVHvORJ/VGi7weW40dwUxanRScPKzDoLJfFTdEIGA537 AP0pX52tU27UUuQ4RPY9pNeH4w7pCkQX5ec6Yk8LbJBexLh+GG+69mDg/+vQ= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:1787:b0:37d:4833:38f5 with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-3821851d4b3mr124877f8f.30.1731543569353; Wed, 13 Nov 2024 16:19:29 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHla6u9cLVl1Wqs52W5Mfvd5j65qZLmBa44jl8fJ5Gw0Gn/CPj8Fjn/+LKoJOkV6nFVRLDqOw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:1787:b0:37d:4833:38f5 with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-3821851d4b3mr124859f8f.30.1731543569024; Wed, 13 Nov 2024 16:19:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from debian (2a01cb058d23d600736cb2b04c893998.ipv6.abo.wanadoo.fr. [2a01:cb05:8d23:d600:736c:b2b0:4c89:3998]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5b1f17b1804b1-432da298760sm3619415e9.37.2024.11.13.16.19.27 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 13 Nov 2024 16:19:28 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2024 01:19:25 +0100 From: Guillaume Nault To: Simon Horman Cc: Roger Quadros , Siddharth Vadapalli , Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, srk@ti.com, Pekka Varis , Ido Schimmel Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 0/2] net: ethernet: ti: am65-cpsw: enable DSCP to priority map for RX Message-ID: References: <20241109-am65-cpsw-multi-rx-dscp-v3-0-1cfb76928490@kernel.org> <20241112140833.GP4507@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20241112140833.GP4507@kernel.org> On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 02:08:33PM +0000, Simon Horman wrote: > + Ido and Guilliame > > On Sat, Nov 09, 2024 at 01:00:06PM +0200, Roger Quadros wrote: > > Configure DSCP to Priority mapping registers so that IP precedence > > field (top 3 bits of DSCP) map it to one of the 8 priority queues > > for RX traffic. > > > > Also update Priority to Thread maping to be compliant with > > IEEE802.1Q-2014. Priority Code Point (PCP) 2 is higher priority than > > PCP 0 (Best Effort). PCP 1 (Background) is lower priority than > > PCP 0 (Best Effort). > > > > Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros > > Hi Ido and Guilliame, > > I am wondering if you could find time to review this series. I don't have the IEEE802.1Q-2014 spec at hand, so I focused on patch 2/2. > > --- > > Changes in v3: > > - Added Reviewed-by tag to patch 1 > > - Added macros for DSCP PRI field size and DSCP PRI per register > > - Drop unnecessary readl() in am65_cpsw_port_set_dscp_map() > > - Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241107-am65-cpsw-multi-rx-dscp-v2-0-9e9cd1920035@kernel.org > > > > Changes in v2: > > - Updated references to more recent standard IEEE802.1Q-2014. > > - Dropped reference to web link which might change in the future. > > - Typo fix in commit log. > > - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241105-am65-cpsw-multi-rx-dscp-v1-0-38db85333c88@kernel.org > > > > --- > > Roger Quadros (2): > > net: ethernet: ti: am65-cpsw: update pri_thread_map as per IEEE802.1Q-2014 > > net: ethernet: ti: am65-cpsw: enable DSCP to priority map for RX > > > > drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-nuss.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw_ale.c | 36 ++++++++++++--------- > > 2 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > > --- > > base-commit: 42f7652d3eb527d03665b09edac47f85fb600924 > > change-id: 20241101-am65-cpsw-multi-rx-dscp-000b2c4af6d0 > > > > Best regards, > > -- > > Roger Quadros > > >