Hello Bartosz,

On Thu, May 28, 2026 at 10:47:55AM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> On Wed, 27 May 2026 16:57:26 +0200, Uwe Kleine-König (The Capable Hub) wrote:
> > this series targets to use named initializers for platform_device_id
> > arrays. In general these are better readable for humans and more robust
> > to changes in the respective struct definition.
> > 
> > This robustness is needed as I want to do
> > 
> > 	diff --git a/include/linux/mod_devicetable.h b/include/linux/mod_devicetable.h
> > 	--- a/include/linux/mod_devicetable.h
> > 	+++ b/include/linux/mod_devicetable.h
> > 	@@ -610,4 +610,7 @@ struct dmi_system_id {
> > 	 struct platform_device_id {
> > 		char name[PLATFORM_NAME_SIZE];
> > 	-	kernel_ulong_t driver_data;
> > 	+	union {
> > 	+		kernel_ulong_t driver_data;
> > 	+		const void *driver_data_ptr;
> > 	+	};
> > 	 };
> > 
> > [...]
> 
> I fixed your SoB as requested and fixed up patch 2/3 as one of the drivers it
> touched no longer exists in my tree.

Right, I noticed that conflict when rebasing my stack to next-20260527
and assumed you'd cope for that.

Thanks!
Uwe