From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8) Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 12:50:01 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: References: <201006010005.19554.rjw@sisk.pl> <20100601090023.788cabf4@notabene.brown> <201006010232.20263.rjw@sisk.pl> <20100601113309.609349fd@notabene.brown> <20100601122012.1edeaf48@notabene.brown> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: Received: from www.tglx.de ([62.245.132.106]:43946 "EHLO www.tglx.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754934Ab0FAKu4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jun 2010 06:50:56 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20100601122012.1edeaf48@notabene.brown> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Neil Brown Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Alan Stern , Felipe Balbi , =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Arve_Hj=F8nnev=E5g?= , Peter Zijlstra , "Paul@smtp1.linux-foundation.org" , LKML , Florian Mickler , Linux OMAP Mailing List , Linux PM , Alan Cox On Tue, 1 Jun 2010, Neil Brown wrote: > > I think you have acknowledged that there is a race with suspend - thanks. > Next step was "can it be closed". > You seem to suggest that it can, but you describe it as a "work around" > rather than a "bug fix"... > > Do you agree that the race is a "bug", and therefore it is appropriate to > "fix" it assuming an acceptable fix can be found (which I think it can)? If we can fix it, yes we definitely should do and not work around it. Thanks, tglx