Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8)

Kevin Hilman
2010-05-27T18:44:16Z

Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> writes:

> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 07:05:15PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
>
>> I'd prefer we avoided mixing them up. Everyone seems fairly happy with
>> the current operator ordered suspend behaviour I believe ?
>
> No. The current mechanism can lose wakeup events.

And the proposed solution (suspend blockers) does nothing to solve the
loss of wakeup events during forced suspend.

Kevin