Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8)

Matthew Garrett
2010-05-27T21:38:19Z

On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 11:33:32PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 27 May 2010, Alan Stern wrote:
> > The two of you are talking at cross purposes. Thomas is referring to
> > idle-based suspend and Matthew is talking about forced suspend.
>
> Yes, and forced suspend to disk is the same as force suspend to disk,
> which has both nothing to do with sensible resource management.

It doesn't matter. Current forced suspend to RAM is racy with respect to
wakeup events and should be fixed.

--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org