Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8)

Alan Stern
2010-05-27T17:41:34Z

On Thu, 27 May 2010, Thomas Gleixner wrote:

> > Does this mean you believe "echo mem >/sys/power/state" is bad and
> > should be removed? Or "echo disk >/sys/power/state"? They pay no
>
> mem should be replaced by an idle suspend to ram mechanism

In other words, you are suggesting that not only should the Android
patches not be accepted, in addition a large part of the PM suspend
framework should be rewritten?

Alan Stern