From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] omap changes for v2.6.39 merge window Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 03:21:32 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: References: <20110317183048.GW7258@atomide.com> <20110318101512.GA15375@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <201103301906.42429.arnd@arndb.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Return-path: Received: from relais.videotron.ca ([24.201.245.36]:39605 "EHLO relais.videotron.ca" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757044Ab1CaHVd (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Mar 2011 03:21:33 -0400 In-reply-to: Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Linus Torvalds , Arnd Bergmann , Russell King - ARM Linux , Tony Lindgren , David Brown , lkml , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Catalin Marinas On Thu, 31 Mar 2011, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 01:31, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > On ARM there is simply not such thing as a single machine design to > > clone, and a closed source test bench to design for. > > There are other architectures that didn't start from a single root platform, > but still support multi-platform kernels. Sure, so does ARM with some restrictions. Nicolas