From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Santosh Shilimkar Subject: RE: [PATCH 00/12] OMAP: clock/SRAM: patches for 2.6.38, part one Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 12:23:55 +0530 Message-ID: References: <20101214063308.21555.76050.stgit@twilight.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Return-path: Received: from na3sys009aog112.obsmtp.com ([74.125.149.207]:59597 "EHLO na3sys009aog112.obsmtp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754313Ab0LNGx4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Dec 2010 01:53:56 -0500 Received: by pwj4 with SMTP id 4so78991pwj.24 for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 22:53:56 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Paul Walmsley , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > -----Original Message----- > From: Santosh Shilimkar [mailto:santosh.shilimkar@ti.com] > Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2010 12:19 PM > To: Paul Walmsley; linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm- > kernel@lists.infradead.org > Subject: RE: [PATCH 00/12] OMAP: clock/SRAM: patches for 2.6.38, part one > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-omap- > > owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Paul Walmsley > > Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2010 12:05 PM > > To: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > > Subject: [PATCH 00/12] OMAP: clock/SRAM: patches for 2.6.38, part one > > > I guess you wanted to say "SCRM" instead of SRAM in subject line > Please ignore my comment Paul. The series does have a SRAM fix.