From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rajendra Nayak Subject: RE: handling clock nodes with both parent and divider selection Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 09:38:21 +0530 Message-ID: References: <045d24bba9bbbe9fa47f0f8aa9901b7e@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Return-path: Received: from na3sys009aog110.obsmtp.com ([74.125.149.203]:55389 "EHLO na3sys009aog110.obsmtp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751295Ab1BBEI0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Feb 2011 23:08:26 -0500 Received: by fxm19 with SMTP id 19so7868687fxm.8 for ; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 20:08:23 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Paul Walmsley Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org > -----Original Message----- > From: Paul Walmsley [mailto:paul@pwsan.com] > Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2011 10:03 PM > To: Rajendra Nayak > Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org > Subject: RE: handling clock nodes with both parent and divider selection > > On Tue, 1 Feb 2011, Rajendra Nayak wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Paul Walmsley [mailto:paul@pwsan.com] > > > Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2011 4:43 AM > > > > > At some point in the future, hopefully we'll be able to split all of the > > > multiplexers and dividers into their own struct clks, or struct > > omap_clks, > > > or something, so we don't have to implement these hacks. As I > > understand > > > it, that would be closer to the actual hardware, anyway. The right time > > > to do that would be after the clktype conversion... > > > > Ok, I am not completely sure what clktype conversion means, but will > > wait for it. > > I'd suggest not waiting for it, but implementing something now, similar to > OMAP3, if it won't be too big of a hack. Yup, I will. I just meant to say will wait for your patches to see what clktype conversion meant, since I did not know of it. Did not mean to say will wait for it to add the divider control for aux clks :) > > > - Paul