From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fllvem-ot03.ext.ti.com (fllvem-ot03.ext.ti.com [198.47.19.245]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5DF4207DEB; Thu, 6 Mar 2025 22:59:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.47.19.245 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741301962; cv=none; b=fGXSuYaMO6DO4tN09qYXrYR4Q4SMoA7wX9U6gaO8l9cV80nRM52ITOqLQ1PdxZmbOXNYWtEF918Axf/NuLJCwoQkwh7XjgFGbLoOEhqBUeADmU90oTf2VbQWv2+jwWzeT91BeL/UNh+y2WfxOhw8Is9u2rB32+C+Ps9+zcHCs4U= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741301962; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Jf0MxEB10sflgfsvRkT5hws5jwvyGsK7uJS7JlC8ThM=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:CC:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=JAHg84tfKicWXx3W3nEPiBXqE5WajJlEHG/FfZWKrBKSddC/z2fUKgy4PVgnGTlRwQaiTEIkn0lkZRD2hkdnNoXLsNXsIuyEWuVXJwWdAb/gB6rCOI4RvDeQfHI9LwbnZIqO8Rl2frXBZj3oSfiCrDtT2rdEY4vRRQ3NjpZTPfM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ti.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b=jIz0dKih; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.47.19.245 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ti.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="jIz0dKih" Received: from fllv0035.itg.ti.com ([10.64.41.0]) by fllvem-ot03.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 526Mwn6O3789931 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 6 Mar 2025 16:58:49 -0600 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1741301929; bh=Ao1UCJvy5o35BF452S6POkKpCsYW0YF06kyYzjy1P9Q=; h=Date:Subject:To:CC:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=jIz0dKihK45sdAhxyua/6cD8mSzTIXdWaHKJwlmosUljXiD+UOcwk3F6vSDtCCU2k dOp2XKKBijaJpChxkTeTh3VKcuXIqQISf93EGpLsCwQDNphB407BDMGhuVTgi6un6c 8Nz8IC82ROkXdze5WZKwPGl/Ait/1/pz43PD4W78= Received: from DFLE108.ent.ti.com (dfle108.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.29]) by fllv0035.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 526Mwn2d039476 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 6 Mar 2025 16:58:49 -0600 Received: from DFLE100.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.21) by DFLE108.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.29) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2507.23; Thu, 6 Mar 2025 16:58:49 -0600 Received: from lelvsmtp5.itg.ti.com (10.180.75.250) by DFLE100.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2507.23 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 6 Mar 2025 16:58:48 -0600 Received: from [10.247.26.234] (lt5cd3040qtn.dhcp.ti.com [10.247.26.234]) by lelvsmtp5.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 526MwmfT002376; Thu, 6 Mar 2025 16:58:48 -0600 Message-ID: Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2025 16:58:48 -0600 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/9] regulator: dt-bindings: Add TI TPS65214 PMIC bindings To: Krzysztof Kozlowski , , , , , , , , , , , , , , CC: , References: <20250305210351.249811-1-s-ramamoorthy@ti.com> <20250305210351.249811-3-s-ramamoorthy@ti.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Shree Ramamoorthy In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-C2ProcessedOrg: 333ef613-75bf-4e12-a4b1-8e3623f5dcea Hi, On 3/6/2025 1:25 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 05/03/2025 22:03, Shree Ramamoorthy wrote: >> >> @@ -102,7 +106,9 @@ allOf: >> properties: >> compatible: >> contains: >> - const: ti,tps65215 >> + enum: >> + - ti,tps65214 >> + - ti,tps65215 > I do not see improvements and you did not respond to my comment. > > Best regards, > Krzysztof Sorry for missing the enum fix, I thought I had included that and should've double checked. Thank you again for reviewing these patches!