Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] net: ethernet: ti: davinci_mdio: Add workaround for errata i2329

[Ravi Gunasekaran <r-gunasekaran@ti.com>]

>> There is atleast one device sh_eth, which is not configured for autosuspend
>> but uses the bit bang core in sh_mdiobb_read() and invokes regular runtime
>> PM functions.
> 
> And that is the point of moving it into the core. It would of just
> worked for you.
> 
> If you don't feel comfortable with making this unconditional, please
> put runtime pm enabled version of mdiobb_read/mdiobb_write() in the
> core and swap sh_eth and any other drivers to using them.
> 

sh_eth is not configured for autosuspend and uses only pm_runtime_put().
davinci_mdio is configured for autosuspend and it must invoke 
pm_runtime_mark_last_busy() before calling pm_runtime_put_autosuspend().
So it looks like, there needs to be a runtime PM version of 
mdiobb_read/mdiobb_write() for each pm_runtime_put_*(). As of now, it's 
only sh_eth which is currently using runtime PM and davinci_mdio would 
be the next one. So at least in this case, two variants of 
mdiobb_read/mdiobb_write() could be added at the moment. By checking 
against the dev->power.use_autosuspend flag, it is possible to support 
both via a single version.

That being said, I'm quite inclined towards the existing implementation, 
where drivers can have wrappers written around 
mdiobb_read/mdiobb_write(). But I might be failing to see the broader 
picture. If having multiple runtime PM versions of 
mdiobb_read/mdiobb_write() benefits many other future drivers, then I 
will go ahead and add the variant(s) in the bitbang core.

Please provide your views on this. Your inputs on the next course of 
action would be helpful.

-- 
Regards,
Ravi