From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>
To: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
Tero Kristo <kristo@kernel.org>, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, cocci@inria.fr
Subject: [PATCH 04/10] clk: ti: Less function calls in ti_fapll_setup() after error detection
Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2023 17:42:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ee5499f6-e06f-4b6a-9483-b73646660117@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20849a8e-e0f5-46df-ad8a-9eae6cbe337b@web.de>
From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2023 13:55:44 +0100
The kfree() function was called in some cases by
the ti_fapll_setup() function during error handling
even if the passed variable contained a null pointer.
* Adjust jump targets.
* Delete two condition checks which became unnecessary
with this refactoring.
Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
---
drivers/clk/ti/fapll.c | 26 ++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/ti/fapll.c b/drivers/clk/ti/fapll.c
index 2db3fc4a443e..e9956e3ccd65 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/ti/fapll.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/ti/fapll.c
@@ -546,11 +546,11 @@ static void __init ti_fapll_setup(struct device_node *node)
MAX_FAPLL_OUTPUTS + 1,
GFP_KERNEL);
if (!fd->outputs.clks)
- goto free;
+ goto free_fd;
init = kzalloc(sizeof(*init), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!init)
- goto free;
+ goto free_clks;
init->ops = &ti_fapll_ops;
name = ti_dt_clk_name(node);
@@ -559,7 +559,7 @@ static void __init ti_fapll_setup(struct device_node *node)
init->num_parents = of_clk_get_parent_count(node);
if (init->num_parents != 2) {
pr_err("%pOFn must have two parents\n", node);
- goto free;
+ goto free_init;
}
of_clk_parent_fill(node, parent_name, 2);
@@ -568,19 +568,19 @@ static void __init ti_fapll_setup(struct device_node *node)
fd->clk_ref = of_clk_get(node, 0);
if (IS_ERR(fd->clk_ref)) {
pr_err("%pOFn could not get clk_ref\n", node);
- goto free;
+ goto free_init;
}
fd->clk_bypass = of_clk_get(node, 1);
if (IS_ERR(fd->clk_bypass)) {
pr_err("%pOFn could not get clk_bypass\n", node);
- goto free;
+ goto put_clk_ref;
}
fd->base = of_iomap(node, 0);
if (!fd->base) {
pr_err("%pOFn could not get IO base\n", node);
- goto free;
+ goto put_clk_bypass;
}
if (fapll_is_ddr_pll(fd->base))
@@ -653,14 +653,16 @@ static void __init ti_fapll_setup(struct device_node *node)
unmap:
iounmap(fd->base);
-free:
- if (fd->clk_bypass)
- clk_put(fd->clk_bypass);
- if (fd->clk_ref)
- clk_put(fd->clk_ref);
+put_clk_bypass:
+ clk_put(fd->clk_bypass);
+put_clk_ref:
+ clk_put(fd->clk_ref);
+free_init:
+ kfree(init);
+free_clks:
kfree(fd->outputs.clks);
+free_fd:
kfree(fd);
- kfree(init);
}
CLK_OF_DECLARE(ti_fapll_clock, "ti,dm816-fapll-clock", ti_fapll_setup);
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-24 16:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-24 16:33 [PATCH 00/10] clk: ti: Adjustments for eight function implementations Markus Elfring
2023-12-24 16:36 ` [PATCH 01/10] clk: ti: Less function calls in of_omap2_apll_setup() after error detection Markus Elfring
2023-12-27 16:38 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-12-24 16:38 ` [PATCH 02/10] clk: ti: Less function calls in of_dra7_apll_setup() " Markus Elfring
2023-12-24 16:40 ` [PATCH 03/10] clk: ti: Use common code in omap_clk_register_apll() Markus Elfring
2023-12-24 16:42 ` Markus Elfring [this message]
2023-12-24 16:44 ` [PATCH 05/10] clk: ti: One function call less in ti_fapll_synth_setup() after error detection Markus Elfring
2023-12-24 16:45 ` [PATCH 06/10] clk: ti: Return directly after a failed kzalloc() in of_mux_clk_setup() Markus Elfring
2023-12-24 16:47 ` [PATCH 07/10] clk: ti: Less function calls in _ti_omap4_clkctrl_setup() after error detection Markus Elfring
2023-12-24 16:48 ` [PATCH 08/10] clk: ti: Use common error handling code in _ti_omap4_clkctrl_setup() Markus Elfring
2023-12-24 16:50 ` [PATCH 09/10] clk: ti: Less function calls in _ti_clkctrl_clk_register() after error detection Markus Elfring
2023-12-28 5:18 ` kernel test robot
2023-12-28 6:39 ` [09/10] " Markus Elfring
2023-12-24 16:52 ` [PATCH 10/10] clk: ti: Delete an unnecessary initialisation in _ti_clkctrl_clk_register() Markus Elfring
2023-12-27 16:39 ` [PATCH 00/10] clk: ti: Adjustments for eight function implementations Andy Shevchenko
2024-02-20 9:27 ` Tony Lindgren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ee5499f6-e06f-4b6a-9483-b73646660117@web.de \
--to=markus.elfring@web.de \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev \
--cc=cocci@inria.fr \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kristo@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox